Asset Attribution Stability And Portfolio Construction: An Educational Example

James Chong, William P. Jennings, G. Phillips
{"title":"Asset Attribution Stability And Portfolio Construction: An Educational Example","authors":"James Chong, William P. Jennings, G. Phillips","doi":"10.19030/AJBE.V7I2.8470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper illustrates how a third statistic from asset pricing models, the R-squared statistic, may have information that can help in portfolio construction. Using a traditional CAPM model in comparison to an 18-factor Arbitrage Pricing Style Model, a portfolio separation test is conducted. Portfolio returns and risk metrics are compared using data from the Dow Jones 30 stocks over the period January 2007 through October 2013. Various teaching points are discussed and illustrated.","PeriodicalId":356538,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Business Education","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Business Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/AJBE.V7I2.8470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper illustrates how a third statistic from asset pricing models, the R-squared statistic, may have information that can help in portfolio construction. Using a traditional CAPM model in comparison to an 18-factor Arbitrage Pricing Style Model, a portfolio separation test is conducted. Portfolio returns and risk metrics are compared using data from the Dow Jones 30 stocks over the period January 2007 through October 2013. Various teaching points are discussed and illustrated.
资产归因稳定性与投资组合构建:一个教育实例
本文说明了资产定价模型中的第三个统计量,即r平方统计量,如何能够提供有助于投资组合构建的信息。将传统CAPM模型与18因子套利定价模型进行比较,进行组合分离检验。投资组合回报和风险指标的比较使用的是2007年1月至2013年10月期间道琼斯30指数成份股的数据。讨论和说明了各种教学要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信