Decarbonization Will Not Come for Free: Asset-M Marginal Abatement Cost Curve

Osama Mohammed Al Kindi, Suleiman Al Hinai, Hilal Ghefeili, Marwan Al Sawafi, Mohammed Abri, V. Hugonet, Taher Ghailani, Raied Dabbagh
{"title":"Decarbonization Will Not Come for Free: Asset-M Marginal Abatement Cost Curve","authors":"Osama Mohammed Al Kindi, Suleiman Al Hinai, Hilal Ghefeili, Marwan Al Sawafi, Mohammed Abri, V. Hugonet, Taher Ghailani, Raied Dabbagh","doi":"10.2118/214414-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Net Zero pathway is critical for the sustainability and life quality on Earth, yet the decarbonization efforts will not come for free. In this paper, the in-depth investigation of all the applicable decarbonization levers for Asset-M has been investigated. Worth to mention that Asset-M is the second Largest Asset for Oil production in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO), which is located to the East region of Dhofar in the South of the Sultanate of Oman. The work presented here will illustrate the decarbonization cost for the different projects from a qualitative screening point of view.\n PDO as the main oil and gas producer in the Sultanate of Oman has pledged to reduce its Source 1 & 2 emissions by 50% in 2030 and to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. A mission that is not only difficult with the current available technologies but also very expensive and require a lot of funding and collaboration between the different research and governmental entities.\n The first step in this decarbonization exercise was to pinpoint the sources of emissions, for Asset M these are mainly characterized in Flaring, Power consumption, Fuel gas for crude processing and other emissions associated to the infrastructure such as stationary combustion, transportation and fugitives. A benchmark exercise was conducted to understand the cost of the different technologies capable to decarbonize Asset-M based on the different sources available.\n A Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) analysis was used to screen the different decarbonization levers from a comparison point of view. The analysis does illustrate options with viable commerciality yet for those options which appear noneconomical it does highlight the cost of Carbon per ton needed for the projects to fly either through government tax credit or other type of subsides.\n It is clear from the MACC analysis conducted based on global benchmark data of Renewables, batteries cost, gas and oil prices and others; that the decarbonization towards net zero emission will not come for free. Billions of Dollars will have to be spent for two main good reasons:\n The technology cost is still high due to the current level of maturity and scale (e.g. CCUS, Hydrogen, Renewables, batteries and more) Carbon is still not taxed in many countries and hence the attitude of the Oil and Gas industry is yet to pick up the momentum and urgency to accelerate new technologies trials which will help in unlocking more sustainable but economical solutions for decarbonization.\n The information presented here will be published for the first time specially when it comes to the potential of Carbon cost escalation if net Zero emission pathway is mandated, and under any circumstance, Decarbonization will not come for Free.","PeriodicalId":306106,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214414-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Net Zero pathway is critical for the sustainability and life quality on Earth, yet the decarbonization efforts will not come for free. In this paper, the in-depth investigation of all the applicable decarbonization levers for Asset-M has been investigated. Worth to mention that Asset-M is the second Largest Asset for Oil production in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO), which is located to the East region of Dhofar in the South of the Sultanate of Oman. The work presented here will illustrate the decarbonization cost for the different projects from a qualitative screening point of view. PDO as the main oil and gas producer in the Sultanate of Oman has pledged to reduce its Source 1 & 2 emissions by 50% in 2030 and to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. A mission that is not only difficult with the current available technologies but also very expensive and require a lot of funding and collaboration between the different research and governmental entities. The first step in this decarbonization exercise was to pinpoint the sources of emissions, for Asset M these are mainly characterized in Flaring, Power consumption, Fuel gas for crude processing and other emissions associated to the infrastructure such as stationary combustion, transportation and fugitives. A benchmark exercise was conducted to understand the cost of the different technologies capable to decarbonize Asset-M based on the different sources available. A Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) analysis was used to screen the different decarbonization levers from a comparison point of view. The analysis does illustrate options with viable commerciality yet for those options which appear noneconomical it does highlight the cost of Carbon per ton needed for the projects to fly either through government tax credit or other type of subsides. It is clear from the MACC analysis conducted based on global benchmark data of Renewables, batteries cost, gas and oil prices and others; that the decarbonization towards net zero emission will not come for free. Billions of Dollars will have to be spent for two main good reasons: The technology cost is still high due to the current level of maturity and scale (e.g. CCUS, Hydrogen, Renewables, batteries and more) Carbon is still not taxed in many countries and hence the attitude of the Oil and Gas industry is yet to pick up the momentum and urgency to accelerate new technologies trials which will help in unlocking more sustainable but economical solutions for decarbonization. The information presented here will be published for the first time specially when it comes to the potential of Carbon cost escalation if net Zero emission pathway is mandated, and under any circumstance, Decarbonization will not come for Free.
脱碳不会免费:资产- m边际减排成本曲线
净零排放途径对地球上的可持续性和生活质量至关重要,但脱碳努力不会免费。本文对Asset-M所有适用的脱碳杠杆进行了深入研究。值得一提的是,Asset- m是阿曼石油开发公司(PDO)的第二大石油生产资产,位于阿曼苏丹国南部的Dhofar东部地区。本文所介绍的工作将从定性筛选的角度说明不同项目的脱碳成本。作为阿曼苏丹国主要的油气生产商,PDO承诺到2030年将其源1和源2的排放量减少50%,到2050年实现净零排放。这项任务不仅在现有的技术条件下很难完成,而且耗资巨大,需要大量的资金和不同研究机构与政府机构之间的合作。脱碳工作的第一步是确定排放源,对于资产M来说,这些主要特征是燃烧、电力消耗、原油加工的燃料气体以及与基础设施(如固定燃烧、运输和逃逸)相关的其他排放。我们进行了基准测试,以了解基于不同可用资源使Asset-M脱碳的不同技术的成本。边际减排成本曲线(MACC)分析用于筛选不同的脱碳杠杆从比较的角度来看。分析确实说明了可行的商业选择,但对于那些看起来不经济的选择,它确实强调了项目通过政府税收抵免或其他形式的补贴飞行所需的每吨碳成本。MACC的分析基于可再生能源、电池成本、天然气和石油价格等全球基准数据;向净零排放的脱碳不会是免费的。数十亿美元将不得不花在两个主要理由:技术成本仍然很高,由于当前的成熟度水平和规模(例如CCUS、氢、可再生能源,电池和更多)在许多国家仍然没有对碳排放征税,因此石油和天然气行业的态度还没有拿起动量和紧迫感,加快新技术试验将帮助解锁更可持续的,但脱碳经济的解决方案。这里提供的信息将首次发布,特别是当涉及到净零排放途径的潜在碳成本上升时,在任何情况下,脱碳都不会免费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信