Herbal Plants as Feed Additives in Broiler Chicken Diets

P. A. Vlaicu, T. Panaite, A. Untea, L. Idriceanu, G. M. Cornescu
{"title":"Herbal Plants as Feed Additives in Broiler Chicken Diets","authors":"P. A. Vlaicu, T. Panaite, A. Untea, L. Idriceanu, G. M. Cornescu","doi":"10.2478/azibna-2021-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study evaluated the effect of some herbal plants as natural feed additives on broiler production parameters, carcass parts, and breast meat quality. A total of 150 broiler chicks, Cobb 500 hybrid, were allocated to five treatments with 30 broilers /group, for 42 days. The experimental treatments were: Control (C); a diet containing 5% alfalfa meal (A); a diet containing 5% alfalfa meal and 1% basil (AB); a diet containing 5% alfalfa and 1% thyme (AT) and a diet containing 5% alfalfa and 1% sage (AS). Bodyweight was significantly (P<0.05) affected in AS group compared with C and A groups. Feed conversion ratio was significantly higher only in A and AB groups. Experimental groups had significantly greater (P<0.05) gizzard weight. The total polyphenols content and the antioxidant capacity were significantly (P<0.05) higher in AB, AT, and AS groups versus the C group. The cholesterol concentration was significantly (P<0.05) decreased in AB, AT, and AS meat samples compared with C and A samples. Instrumental colour measurements indicated significant alterations (P<0.05) among the groups regarding the values of L*, a*, b*, H°, C*, and ΔE*. The texture analysis showed that hardness, gumminess, and chewiness were significantly (P<0.05) higher in AB, AT, and AS groups than in C and A groups.","PeriodicalId":170796,"journal":{"name":"Archiva Zootechnica","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiva Zootechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/azibna-2021-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated the effect of some herbal plants as natural feed additives on broiler production parameters, carcass parts, and breast meat quality. A total of 150 broiler chicks, Cobb 500 hybrid, were allocated to five treatments with 30 broilers /group, for 42 days. The experimental treatments were: Control (C); a diet containing 5% alfalfa meal (A); a diet containing 5% alfalfa meal and 1% basil (AB); a diet containing 5% alfalfa and 1% thyme (AT) and a diet containing 5% alfalfa and 1% sage (AS). Bodyweight was significantly (P<0.05) affected in AS group compared with C and A groups. Feed conversion ratio was significantly higher only in A and AB groups. Experimental groups had significantly greater (P<0.05) gizzard weight. The total polyphenols content and the antioxidant capacity were significantly (P<0.05) higher in AB, AT, and AS groups versus the C group. The cholesterol concentration was significantly (P<0.05) decreased in AB, AT, and AS meat samples compared with C and A samples. Instrumental colour measurements indicated significant alterations (P<0.05) among the groups regarding the values of L*, a*, b*, H°, C*, and ΔE*. The texture analysis showed that hardness, gumminess, and chewiness were significantly (P<0.05) higher in AB, AT, and AS groups than in C and A groups.
草本植物在肉鸡日粮中的饲料添加剂研究
摘要本研究评价了几种草本植物作为天然饲料添加剂对肉鸡生产参数、胴体部位和胸肉品质的影响。选取150只Cobb 500杂交肉鸡,分为5个处理,每组30只,试验期42 d。实验处理为:对照(C);饲粮中含有5%的苜蓿草粉(a);饲粮中含有5%紫花苜蓿粉和1%罗勒(AB);5%苜蓿+ 1%百里香(AT)和5%苜蓿+ 1%鼠尾草(AS)的饲粮。与C、A组相比,AS组对体重有显著影响(P<0.05)。饲料系数只有A组和AB组显著高于对照组。试验组砂囊重量显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。AB组、AT组和AS组总多酚含量和抗氧化能力显著高于C组(P<0.05)。与C和A肉相比,AB、AT和AS肉样品的胆固醇浓度显著(P<0.05)降低。仪器颜色测量结果显示,各组之间L*、a*、b*、H°、C*和ΔE*的值有显著变化(P<0.05)。质地分析显示,AB、AT和AS组的硬度、胶度和嚼劲显著高于C和A组(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信