{"title":"Textures of Imagination","authors":"R. Evan","doi":"10.5117/9789463722100_CH04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rejecting any binary thinking that would have reading novels as an act\n of imagination while films are received through perception, this chapter\n examines how adaptations are experienced through the embodied imagination.\n This chapter builds upon approaches to imagination in cognitive\n aesthetics to argue that imagination is grounded in perception. This\n chapter draws on two case studies, Wonder (Stephen Chbosky, 2017) and\n Mood Indigo (Michel Gondry, 2013), both criticized for making tangible\n their literary sources in a manner than nullifies imaginative engagement.\n Rather, I argue that spectators feel their way into the worlds and\n existential feelings of their characters through the embodied imagination.\n This chapter suggests that perception can lead to a greater imaginative\n understanding of a work, the world, and others, and how such an imaginative\n connection might shift our point of view. That is, screen adaptations\n are equipped to enact a leap from sight to insight.","PeriodicalId":253689,"journal":{"name":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722100_CH04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rejecting any binary thinking that would have reading novels as an act
of imagination while films are received through perception, this chapter
examines how adaptations are experienced through the embodied imagination.
This chapter builds upon approaches to imagination in cognitive
aesthetics to argue that imagination is grounded in perception. This
chapter draws on two case studies, Wonder (Stephen Chbosky, 2017) and
Mood Indigo (Michel Gondry, 2013), both criticized for making tangible
their literary sources in a manner than nullifies imaginative engagement.
Rather, I argue that spectators feel their way into the worlds and
existential feelings of their characters through the embodied imagination.
This chapter suggests that perception can lead to a greater imaginative
understanding of a work, the world, and others, and how such an imaginative
connection might shift our point of view. That is, screen adaptations
are equipped to enact a leap from sight to insight.