{"title":"How to Correctly Interpret, Apply, and Generalize the TRM Model: Some Guidelines for Real-Life Projects","authors":"C. Magni","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3349065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explains how to correctly interpret, and apply the TRM model, named after Teichroew, Robichek, and Montalbano (1965a,b). In particular, it explicitly shows the relation among the three rates involved in the model, namely, the project investment rate (PIR), the project financing rate (PFR), the cost of capital (COC). Their role as drivers of value creation is analyzed in detail. The paper also shows how to remove the original stringent assumptions which makes this important model not adequate for use in real-life contexts. Specifically, we remove the assumption according to which PIR and PFR are constant and are mathematically derived assuming one of them is equal to the COC; we show that they are easily derived from the actual estimates of the project’s prospective revenues and costs, as weighted means of the period returns on capital. An average return on capital (ROC) will be shown to be the unique project rate of return.","PeriodicalId":443021,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Educator: Courses","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Educator: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3349065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explains how to correctly interpret, and apply the TRM model, named after Teichroew, Robichek, and Montalbano (1965a,b). In particular, it explicitly shows the relation among the three rates involved in the model, namely, the project investment rate (PIR), the project financing rate (PFR), the cost of capital (COC). Their role as drivers of value creation is analyzed in detail. The paper also shows how to remove the original stringent assumptions which makes this important model not adequate for use in real-life contexts. Specifically, we remove the assumption according to which PIR and PFR are constant and are mathematically derived assuming one of them is equal to the COC; we show that they are easily derived from the actual estimates of the project’s prospective revenues and costs, as weighted means of the period returns on capital. An average return on capital (ROC) will be shown to be the unique project rate of return.
本文解释了如何正确解释和应用以Teichroew, Robichek, and Montalbano (1965a,b)命名的TRM模型。特别地,它明确地展示了模型中涉及的三种比率,即项目投资率(PIR)、项目融资率(PFR)、资金成本(COC)之间的关系。详细分析了它们作为价值创造驱动者的作用。本文还展示了如何去除原始的严格假设,这使得这个重要的模型不适合在现实生活中使用。具体来说,我们去掉了PIR和PFR为常数的假设,并在数学上推导出其中一个等于COC的假设;我们表明,它们很容易从项目预期收入和成本的实际估计中得出,作为期间资本回报率的加权手段。平均资本回报率(ROC)将显示为唯一的项目回报率。