The economic organization of nuclear power construction projects: Organizational models for production and financing

Ben Wealer
{"title":"The economic organization of nuclear power construction projects: Organizational models for production and financing","authors":"Ben Wealer","doi":"10.1080/24724718.2021.2012353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to limit the rise in global average temperature to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, international organizations such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggest an increasing role for new nuclear power plants. Their pathways entail a large number of new builds by 2050. Given the projected large-scale deployment of new nuclear reactors, it is therefore essential to analyse the existing organizational models. This paper provides an institutional economic analysis of the organizational models for the production and financing of new nuclear power plants. A particular focus is on private sector involvement and competition. In this regard, the paper looks at the division of tasks between state and private actors in financing and production, the governance structures of the companies involved, their market shares, and their degree of vertical integration. The rate of nuclear expansion proposed under the IEA and IPPC scenarios is higher than has ever been achieved in the history of the industry, which has been in decline and contracting since the 1980s. Since the turn of the century, the nuclear sector has been dominated by Russia, while traditional reactor vendors are continually on the brink of bankruptcy and have more or less abandoned reactor exports. Heavy forging capacity for reactor pressure vessels continues to constrain the supply chain, although some new production capacity has been added. Small modular reactors would not alleviate this situation. On the contrary, they would also rely on heavy forges in Russia and Asia. Government support is required for new nuclear power plants (NPPs), be it in liberalized markets or coordinated economies. In liberalized markets support can take the form of federal loans, or power purchase agreements. Countries with regulated markets and a state-owned nuclear industry such as China, Russia or India will probably continue to build NPPs. However, expansion is slowing down even in these countries, while the share of renewables is on the rise.","PeriodicalId":143411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mega Infrastructure & Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24724718.2021.2012353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In order to limit the rise in global average temperature to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, international organizations such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggest an increasing role for new nuclear power plants. Their pathways entail a large number of new builds by 2050. Given the projected large-scale deployment of new nuclear reactors, it is therefore essential to analyse the existing organizational models. This paper provides an institutional economic analysis of the organizational models for the production and financing of new nuclear power plants. A particular focus is on private sector involvement and competition. In this regard, the paper looks at the division of tasks between state and private actors in financing and production, the governance structures of the companies involved, their market shares, and their degree of vertical integration. The rate of nuclear expansion proposed under the IEA and IPPC scenarios is higher than has ever been achieved in the history of the industry, which has been in decline and contracting since the 1980s. Since the turn of the century, the nuclear sector has been dominated by Russia, while traditional reactor vendors are continually on the brink of bankruptcy and have more or less abandoned reactor exports. Heavy forging capacity for reactor pressure vessels continues to constrain the supply chain, although some new production capacity has been added. Small modular reactors would not alleviate this situation. On the contrary, they would also rely on heavy forges in Russia and Asia. Government support is required for new nuclear power plants (NPPs), be it in liberalized markets or coordinated economies. In liberalized markets support can take the form of federal loans, or power purchase agreements. Countries with regulated markets and a state-owned nuclear industry such as China, Russia or India will probably continue to build NPPs. However, expansion is slowing down even in these countries, while the share of renewables is on the rise.
核电建设项目的经济组织:生产与融资的组织模式
为了将全球平均气温的上升幅度限制在比工业化前水平高1.5℃以内,国际能源署(IEA)和政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)等国际组织建议增加新建核电站的作用。他们的道路需要在2050年之前建造大量的新建筑。鉴于预计将大规模部署新的核反应堆,因此有必要分析现有的组织模式。本文对新建核电站的生产和融资的组织模式进行了制度经济学分析。一个特别的重点是私营部门的参与和竞争。在这方面,本文考察了国家和私人行为体在融资和生产方面的任务分工、所涉公司的治理结构、市场份额和垂直整合程度。根据国际能源署和国际植物保护公约的设想,核能扩张的速度比该行业历史上任何时候都要高。自20世纪80年代以来,该行业一直处于衰退和收缩状态。自世纪之交以来,核能行业一直由俄罗斯主导,而传统的反应堆供应商不断处于破产边缘,或多或少放弃了反应堆出口。尽管已经增加了一些新的生产能力,但反应堆压力容器的重型锻造能力继续制约着供应链。小型模块化反应堆无法缓解这种情况。相反,他们还将依赖俄罗斯和亚洲的重型锻造厂。无论是在自由化市场还是协调经济中,新建核电站都需要政府的支持。在自由化的市场中,支持可以采取联邦贷款或电力购买协议的形式。中国、俄罗斯和印度等拥有监管市场和国有核工业的国家可能会继续建设核电站。然而,即使在这些国家,扩张速度也在放缓,而可再生能源的份额却在上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信