Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling.

R. Barrack, R. Butler, D. R. Laster, P. Andrews
{"title":"Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling.","authors":"R. Barrack, R. Butler, D. R. Laster, P. Andrews","doi":"10.1054/ARTH.2001.28359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of the size and shape of the neck and the taper of the femoral stem on dislocation rate after revision total hip arthroplasty was examined. Design I had a large (14/16), long taper with a circular neck cross-section; a fixed 42-mm offset; and a neck that was anteverted relative to the stem. Design II was characterized by a smaller (12/14), shorter taper; a trapezoidal neck cross-section; a progressive (40-50 mm) offset; and no neck anteversion relative to the stem. The stems were digitized and placed through a range of motion using virtual reality software, and the cross-sectional area of the neck, length of the taper, and total arc of motion before impingement between the neck and liner were compared. The dislocation rate at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up was 15.4% (8 of 52) for design I compared with 4.3% (2 of 46) for design II. This finding was consistent with the results of computer modeling, which showed that design I had a cross-sectional area that was 32% greater and a total arc of motion that was 76% less compared with design II. The results suggest that neck and taper design may be an important factor in dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.","PeriodicalId":280050,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of arthroplasty","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1054/ARTH.2001.28359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

The effect of the size and shape of the neck and the taper of the femoral stem on dislocation rate after revision total hip arthroplasty was examined. Design I had a large (14/16), long taper with a circular neck cross-section; a fixed 42-mm offset; and a neck that was anteverted relative to the stem. Design II was characterized by a smaller (12/14), shorter taper; a trapezoidal neck cross-section; a progressive (40-50 mm) offset; and no neck anteversion relative to the stem. The stems were digitized and placed through a range of motion using virtual reality software, and the cross-sectional area of the neck, length of the taper, and total arc of motion before impingement between the neck and liner were compared. The dislocation rate at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up was 15.4% (8 of 52) for design I compared with 4.3% (2 of 46) for design II. This finding was consistent with the results of computer modeling, which showed that design I had a cross-sectional area that was 32% greater and a total arc of motion that was 76% less compared with design II. The results suggest that neck and taper design may be an important factor in dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty.
改良全髋关节置换术后椎体设计和脱位:临床结果和计算机模型。
观察股骨颈的大小、形状和股骨柄的锥度对改良全髋关节置换术后脱位率的影响。设计我有一个大的(14/16),长锥度与圆颈截面;固定42毫米偏移;颈部相对于茎部是前倾的。设计II的特点是更小(12/14),更短的锥度;梯形颈部横截面;一个渐进的(40-50毫米)偏移;颈部也没有相对于躯干的前倾。利用虚拟现实软件对假体进行数字化处理,并通过一定范围的运动来放置假体,比较假体颈部的横截面积、锥度长度以及假体颈部与衬板碰撞前的总运动弧度。在至少2年的随访中,设计I的脱位率为15.4%(52人中有8人),而设计II的脱位率为4.3%(46人中有2人)。这一发现与计算机建模的结果一致,即与设计II相比,设计I的横截面积增加了32%,总运动弧度减少了76%。结果表明,颈部和锥度设计可能是改良全髋关节置换术后脱位的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信