Assert and negate revisited: modal semantics for UML sequence diagrams

D. Harel, S. Maoz
{"title":"Assert and negate revisited: modal semantics for UML sequence diagrams","authors":"D. Harel, S. Maoz","doi":"10.1145/1138953.1138958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Live Sequence Charts (LSC) extend Message Sequence Charts (MSC), mainly by distinguishing possible from necessary behavior. They thus enable the specification of rich multi-modal scenario-based properties, such as mandatory, possible and forbidden scenarios. The sequence diagrams of UML 2.0 enrich those of previous versions of UML by two new operators, assert and negate, for specifying required and forbidden behaviors, which appear to have been inspired by LSC. The UML 2.0 semantics of sequence diagrams, however, being based on pairs of valid and invalid sets of traces, is inadequate, and prevents the new operators from being used effectively. We propose an extension of, and a different semantics for this UML language - Modal UML Sequence Diagrams (MUSD) - based on the universal/existential modal semantics of LSC. MUSD can be formally defined as a UML profile, thus paving the way to apply formal verification, synthesis, and scenario-based execution techniques from LSC to the mainstream UML standard.","PeriodicalId":151927,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1138953.1138958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

Live Sequence Charts (LSC) extend Message Sequence Charts (MSC), mainly by distinguishing possible from necessary behavior. They thus enable the specification of rich multi-modal scenario-based properties, such as mandatory, possible and forbidden scenarios. The sequence diagrams of UML 2.0 enrich those of previous versions of UML by two new operators, assert and negate, for specifying required and forbidden behaviors, which appear to have been inspired by LSC. The UML 2.0 semantics of sequence diagrams, however, being based on pairs of valid and invalid sets of traces, is inadequate, and prevents the new operators from being used effectively. We propose an extension of, and a different semantics for this UML language - Modal UML Sequence Diagrams (MUSD) - based on the universal/existential modal semantics of LSC. MUSD can be formally defined as a UML profile, thus paving the way to apply formal verification, synthesis, and scenario-based execution techniques from LSC to the mainstream UML standard.
重申断言和否定:UML序列图的模态语义
动态序列图(LSC)扩展了消息序列图(MSC),主要是通过区分可能的行为和必要的行为。因此,它们能够规范丰富的基于多模式场景的属性,例如强制的、可能的和禁止的场景。UML 2.0的序列图通过两个新的操作符(断言和否定)丰富了以前版本的UML,用于指定需要的和禁止的行为,这似乎受到了LSC的启发。然而,序列图的UML 2.0语义,基于有效和无效的跟踪集对,是不充分的,并且阻止了新的操作符被有效地使用。基于LSC的通用/存在模态语义,我们提出了该UML语言的扩展和不同的语义——模态UML序列图(MUSD)。MUSD可以正式地定义为UML概要文件,从而为从LSC到主流UML标准应用正式的验证、综合和基于场景的执行技术铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信