A Systematic Literature Review on Malicious Use of Reinforcement Learning

Torstein Meyer, Nektaria Kaloudi, Jingyue Li
{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review on Malicious Use of Reinforcement Learning","authors":"Torstein Meyer, Nektaria Kaloudi, Jingyue Li","doi":"10.1109/EnCyCriS52570.2021.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the inception of reinforcement learning (RL), there has been a growing interest in its application in various complex domains. Although these RL methods offer significant benefits of learning by their own experiences without an accurate system model, RL methods can also be used maliciously. This paper presents a systematic literature review of the state-of-the art RL-based cyberattacks to facilitate and motivate further research to address the potential RL misuse. We reviewed 30 recent primary papers and categorized them into (i) RL for attack planning, (ii) RL for performing intrusions, and (iii) RL for attack optimization. We also proposed an RL-based cyber attacks framework. Our insights on the status and limitations of the existing studies can help motivate related future studies.","PeriodicalId":409275,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Engineering and Cybersecurity of Critical Systems (EnCyCriS)","volume":"287 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Engineering and Cybersecurity of Critical Systems (EnCyCriS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EnCyCriS52570.2021.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the inception of reinforcement learning (RL), there has been a growing interest in its application in various complex domains. Although these RL methods offer significant benefits of learning by their own experiences without an accurate system model, RL methods can also be used maliciously. This paper presents a systematic literature review of the state-of-the art RL-based cyberattacks to facilitate and motivate further research to address the potential RL misuse. We reviewed 30 recent primary papers and categorized them into (i) RL for attack planning, (ii) RL for performing intrusions, and (iii) RL for attack optimization. We also proposed an RL-based cyber attacks framework. Our insights on the status and limitations of the existing studies can help motivate related future studies.
关于恶意使用强化学习的系统文献综述
自强化学习(RL)出现以来,人们对其在各种复杂领域的应用越来越感兴趣。尽管这些强化学习方法在没有准确的系统模型的情况下提供了通过自己的经验学习的显著好处,但强化学习方法也可能被恶意使用。本文对最新的基于强化学习的网络攻击进行了系统的文献综述,以促进和激励进一步的研究,以解决潜在的强化学习滥用问题。我们回顾了最近的30篇主要论文,并将它们分为(i) RL用于攻击计划,(ii) RL用于执行入侵,以及(iii) RL用于攻击优化。我们还提出了一个基于强化学习的网络攻击框架。我们对现有研究的现状和局限性的认识有助于激励相关的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信