Introduction: Material Evidence for Exegetical Practices and Intellectual Engagement with Texts

S. Valente
{"title":"Introduction: Material Evidence for Exegetical Practices and Intellectual Engagement with Texts","authors":"S. Valente","doi":"10.1515/9783110741124-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exegetical practices usually originate in learning contexts. Manuscripts containing annotations often represent an instantiation of an educational and/or scholarly engagement with a given text in a given time and place as well as through the centuries and in different places. So, such written artefacts may offer evidence for uncovering teaching and learning contexts as they were used to store knowledge and guide readers in approaching the commented text(s) they preserve. The educational and scholarly practice of explaining a text originates from various cultural needs by different users within or outside given institutions. The manuscriptological and textual study of such annotations is therefore telling for the material, cultural and social environments in which they were produced and used. In studying this, it is also important to distinguish between individual achievements and widely attested patterns within the transmitted exegeses. Hosting annotations of different kinds and for different purposes written by one or more scribes, manuscripts mediate between tradition and individuals. They may preserve traditional exegetic materials that have been modified and can also be further modified, updated, and adapted for the different needs of user(s) in different times and contexts. Orality should also be taken into account when dealing with exegetical practices, and manuscripts may also offer evidence for oral modes of teaching. In those cultures in which teaching and learning practices were performed","PeriodicalId":103492,"journal":{"name":"Education Materialised","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Materialised","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110741124-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exegetical practices usually originate in learning contexts. Manuscripts containing annotations often represent an instantiation of an educational and/or scholarly engagement with a given text in a given time and place as well as through the centuries and in different places. So, such written artefacts may offer evidence for uncovering teaching and learning contexts as they were used to store knowledge and guide readers in approaching the commented text(s) they preserve. The educational and scholarly practice of explaining a text originates from various cultural needs by different users within or outside given institutions. The manuscriptological and textual study of such annotations is therefore telling for the material, cultural and social environments in which they were produced and used. In studying this, it is also important to distinguish between individual achievements and widely attested patterns within the transmitted exegeses. Hosting annotations of different kinds and for different purposes written by one or more scribes, manuscripts mediate between tradition and individuals. They may preserve traditional exegetic materials that have been modified and can also be further modified, updated, and adapted for the different needs of user(s) in different times and contexts. Orality should also be taken into account when dealing with exegetical practices, and manuscripts may also offer evidence for oral modes of teaching. In those cultures in which teaching and learning practices were performed
引言:注释实践和与文本的智力接触的物质证据
训诂实践通常起源于学习环境。包含注释的手稿通常代表了在特定时间和地点以及几个世纪和不同地方对给定文本的教育和/或学术参与的实例。因此,这些书面文物可能为揭示教学和学习背景提供证据,因为它们被用来存储知识,并引导读者接近它们保存的注释文本。解释文本的教育和学术实践源于特定机构内外不同用户的各种文化需求。因此,对这些注释的手抄学和文本研究说明了它们产生和使用的材料,文化和社会环境。在研究这一点时,区分个人成就和传播的训诂中广泛证实的模式也很重要。由一个或多个抄写员撰写的不同种类和不同目的的注释,手稿调解了传统和个人之间的关系。它们可以保存经过修改的传统教学材料,也可以进一步修改、更新和适应不同时间和背景下用户的不同需求。在处理训诂实践时也应考虑到口头性,手稿也可能为口头教学模式提供证据。在进行教学和学习实践的文化中
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信