Economic Yardsticks for the End of Economic Life: Holdback and Its Adjuncts

D. Purvis
{"title":"Economic Yardsticks for the End of Economic Life: Holdback and Its Adjuncts","authors":"D. Purvis","doi":"10.2118/210226-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Traditional economic measures use chiefly net present value to compare on-going net revenue to plugging liabilities and other retirement liabilities, but operators onshore in the US plan to pay for plugging costs from cash flow. Liabilities have accumulated and continue to accumulate as operators defer plugging. At the same time, production declines, and cash flow tapers and becomes riskier.\n When retirement liabilities become significant compared to thinned cash flow, traditional yardsticks obscure the risk of ultimate insolvency. Future cash flow becomes insufficient to fund liabilities years before the present value flags the inversion. Recognizing the cash shortfall – which can occur surprisingly early when liabilities are allowed to accumulate – can fundamentally change the way the investment is viewed, valued, and managed.\n Planning, therefore, requires new economic yardsticks to characterize the nature of cash flows with large retirement obligations, what can be called \"holdback\" and its adjuncts. These yardsticks look differently at the timing and risk of asset retirement obligations, namely backward from the end of the projection. \"Holdback\" is analogous to payout but in reverse from the end of economic life. Related measures similarly use other conventional yardstick concepts in reverse to characterize the situation more fully and to help an operator avoid orphaning its abandonment liabilities to be paid by taxpayers.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210226-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional economic measures use chiefly net present value to compare on-going net revenue to plugging liabilities and other retirement liabilities, but operators onshore in the US plan to pay for plugging costs from cash flow. Liabilities have accumulated and continue to accumulate as operators defer plugging. At the same time, production declines, and cash flow tapers and becomes riskier. When retirement liabilities become significant compared to thinned cash flow, traditional yardsticks obscure the risk of ultimate insolvency. Future cash flow becomes insufficient to fund liabilities years before the present value flags the inversion. Recognizing the cash shortfall – which can occur surprisingly early when liabilities are allowed to accumulate – can fundamentally change the way the investment is viewed, valued, and managed. Planning, therefore, requires new economic yardsticks to characterize the nature of cash flows with large retirement obligations, what can be called "holdback" and its adjuncts. These yardsticks look differently at the timing and risk of asset retirement obligations, namely backward from the end of the projection. "Holdback" is analogous to payout but in reverse from the end of economic life. Related measures similarly use other conventional yardstick concepts in reverse to characterize the situation more fully and to help an operator avoid orphaning its abandonment liabilities to be paid by taxpayers.
经济生命终结的经济尺度:阻碍及其辅助因素
传统的经济指标主要使用净现值来比较持续净收入与堵漏负债和其他退休负债,但美国陆上运营商计划用现金流来支付堵漏成本。由于作业者推迟封堵,责任已经累积,而且还在继续累积。与此同时,产量下降,现金流减少,风险增大。当退休负债与减少的现金流相比变得显著时,传统的衡量标准掩盖了最终破产的风险。在现值出现反转前几年,未来现金流将不足以为负债提供资金。认识到现金短缺——当负债被允许累积时,现金短缺会出人意料地早出现——可以从根本上改变对投资的看法、评估和管理方式。因此,规划需要新的经济尺度来描述具有大量退休义务的现金流的性质,即所谓的“保留”及其附属品。这些标准以不同的方式看待资产退休义务的时间和风险,即从预测结束时向后看。“滞留”类似于支付,但与经济生命的结束相反。相关措施同样使用其他传统的标准概念,以更全面地描述情况,并帮助作业者避免将其弃置责任交给纳税人来支付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信