EVALUATION OF THE INTEGRATED TEACHING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE (PPKT) PROGRAM FOR STUDENTS OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, FITK UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

M. Sam
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE INTEGRATED TEACHING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE (PPKT) PROGRAM FOR STUDENTS OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, FITK UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA","authors":"M. Sam","doi":"10.30868/IM.V2I02.512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the suitability and benefits of the Integrated Teaching Professional Practice (PPKT) Program for Educational Management (EM) students in developing their competencies. The approach used is program evaluation using the Context-Input-Process-Product (CIPP) model which aims to collect accurate and comprehensive information so that it can be used to assist leaders to make further decisions to redesign, improve, or possibly stop the implementation of the program. The results showed that the PPKT program for EM students was not on target and needed to be stopped immediately or replaced with another program whose value was equivalent because: (1) Theoretically contextual, the PPKT was intended for students from study-based study programs so that it was not suitable for EM students; (2) From the Input aspect, students face the constraints of planning, implementing and evaluating learning, the weak competency of supervisors because their educational background is not from an education degree, teaching staff lack competency; (3) Based on the Process aspect, the PPKT implementation is not appropriate expected especially in teaching and research activities because the supervisor and tutor are not able to carry out their duties and functions properly; and (4) From the Product aspect, PPKT has not been able to improve teaching competence, educational research, educational creation and innovation. The acquisition of a high final score does not reflect their competence because more assessment is based on the subjectivity of tutors and tutors. Based on the results of the study, it was suggested that the Head of the EM Department need to reformulate the vision, mission and competency standards of graduates who are more referring to the competence of education staff, encouraging faculty leaders to immediately issue a decision to terminate the PPKT program for EM students and replace it with other programs with the same weight as PPKT.Keywords: context, input, process, product, PPKT.","PeriodicalId":272445,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam","volume":"1365 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Management: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30868/IM.V2I02.512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe the suitability and benefits of the Integrated Teaching Professional Practice (PPKT) Program for Educational Management (EM) students in developing their competencies. The approach used is program evaluation using the Context-Input-Process-Product (CIPP) model which aims to collect accurate and comprehensive information so that it can be used to assist leaders to make further decisions to redesign, improve, or possibly stop the implementation of the program. The results showed that the PPKT program for EM students was not on target and needed to be stopped immediately or replaced with another program whose value was equivalent because: (1) Theoretically contextual, the PPKT was intended for students from study-based study programs so that it was not suitable for EM students; (2) From the Input aspect, students face the constraints of planning, implementing and evaluating learning, the weak competency of supervisors because their educational background is not from an education degree, teaching staff lack competency; (3) Based on the Process aspect, the PPKT implementation is not appropriate expected especially in teaching and research activities because the supervisor and tutor are not able to carry out their duties and functions properly; and (4) From the Product aspect, PPKT has not been able to improve teaching competence, educational research, educational creation and innovation. The acquisition of a high final score does not reflect their competence because more assessment is based on the subjectivity of tutors and tutors. Based on the results of the study, it was suggested that the Head of the EM Department need to reformulate the vision, mission and competency standards of graduates who are more referring to the competence of education staff, encouraging faculty leaders to immediately issue a decision to terminate the PPKT program for EM students and replace it with other programs with the same weight as PPKT.Keywords: context, input, process, product, PPKT.
对教育管理专业学生综合教学专业实践(ppkt)项目的评估,雅加达,syarif hidayatullah
本研究旨在描述综合教学专业实践(PPKT)计划在培养教育管理(EM)学生能力方面的适用性和益处。所使用的方法是使用上下文-输入-过程-产品(CIPP)模型对项目进行评估,该模型旨在收集准确和全面的信息,以便用于帮助领导者做出进一步的决定,以重新设计,改进或可能停止项目的实施。结果表明,针对EM学生的PPKT计划没有达到目标,需要立即停止或用另一个价值相当的计划取代,因为:(1)理论上,PPKT是针对基于学习的学习计划的学生的,因此它不适合EM学生;(2)从投入方面看,学生面临学习计划、实施和评价的制约,督导人员因学历不同而能力较弱,教学人员能力不足;(3)基于过程方面,由于导师和导师不能正确履行职责和职能,PPKT的实施不适当,特别是在教学和研究活动中;(4)从产品方面看,PPKT在提高教学能力、教育研究、教育创造和创新方面做得不够。最终高分的获得并不能反映他们的能力,因为更多的评估是基于导师和导师的主观性。根据研究结果,建议高等教育系主任重新制定毕业生的愿景、使命和能力标准,更多地参考教育人员的能力,鼓励学院领导立即发布决定,终止高等教育学生的PPKT计划,并以与PPKT同等权重的其他计划取而代之。关键词:语境,输入,过程,产品,PPKT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信