Efficacy of AR Haptic Simulation for Nursing Student Education

Meldin Bektic, Adam Tischler, Nathaniel Fahey, Kwangtaek Kim, Lisa Onesko
{"title":"Efficacy of AR Haptic Simulation for Nursing Student Education","authors":"Meldin Bektic, Adam Tischler, Nathaniel Fahey, Kwangtaek Kim, Lisa Onesko","doi":"10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we examine the effectiveness of using AR haptic simulation as a tool for nursing students to learn physical attributes related to diseases, as well as testing with the simulation rather than pen & paper. We utilize edema, a medical condition that causes swelling in the body's tissues, as an example the students can learn and be tested on. The simulation takes advantage of the Magic Leap and Geomagic Touch as the AR headset and haptic device of choice. Students use these technologies to see different examples of legs that have varying degrees of edema in a 3D space and use the Geomagic Touch to feel the virtual leg. When pressing upon the leg, the object has deformation capabilities which allow the user to see and feel the impressions made upon the skin. We tested this under four different conditions, a desktop 2D version with haptics disabled and enabled, and an AR 3D version with haptics disabled and enabled. We tested these conditions on 8 different subjects, with four being non-nursing professionals, and the other four being from Kent State University (KSU) College of Nursing (CoN). The results showed that qualitatively the subjects felt that the desktop haptics version was the best, however quantitatively the results showed that the subjects scored the highest during the desktop no haptics version.","PeriodicalId":286026,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study we examine the effectiveness of using AR haptic simulation as a tool for nursing students to learn physical attributes related to diseases, as well as testing with the simulation rather than pen & paper. We utilize edema, a medical condition that causes swelling in the body's tissues, as an example the students can learn and be tested on. The simulation takes advantage of the Magic Leap and Geomagic Touch as the AR headset and haptic device of choice. Students use these technologies to see different examples of legs that have varying degrees of edema in a 3D space and use the Geomagic Touch to feel the virtual leg. When pressing upon the leg, the object has deformation capabilities which allow the user to see and feel the impressions made upon the skin. We tested this under four different conditions, a desktop 2D version with haptics disabled and enabled, and an AR 3D version with haptics disabled and enabled. We tested these conditions on 8 different subjects, with four being non-nursing professionals, and the other four being from Kent State University (KSU) College of Nursing (CoN). The results showed that qualitatively the subjects felt that the desktop haptics version was the best, however quantitatively the results showed that the subjects scored the highest during the desktop no haptics version.
AR触觉模拟在护生教育中的效果
在本研究中,我们检验了使用AR触觉模拟作为护理学生学习与疾病相关的身体属性的工具的有效性,以及用模拟而不是纸笔进行测试。我们以水肿为例,这是一种导致身体组织肿胀的医学状况,学生可以学习并接受测试。模拟利用Magic Leap和Geomagic Touch作为AR头显和触觉设备的选择。学生们使用这些技术在3D空间中看到不同程度水肿的腿的不同例子,并使用Geomagic Touch来感受虚拟的腿。当按压腿部时,该物体具有变形能力,允许用户看到和感觉到皮肤上的印痕。我们在四种不同的条件下进行了测试,一个是禁用和启用触觉的桌面2D版本,另一个是禁用和启用触觉的AR 3D版本。我们对8名不同的受试者进行了这些条件的测试,其中4名是非护理专业人员,另外4名来自肯特州立大学护理学院。结果表明,在定性上,受试者认为桌面触觉版本是最好的,而在定量上,结果显示受试者在桌面无触觉版本中得分最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信