Properties of High-Strength and High-Fluidity Lightweight Concrete

K. Fujji, S. Adachi, M. Takeuchi, M. Kakizaki, H. Edahiro, T. Inoue, Y. Yamamoto
{"title":"Properties of High-Strength and High-Fluidity Lightweight Concrete","authors":"K. Fujji, S. Adachi, M. Takeuchi, M. Kakizaki, H. Edahiro, T. Inoue, Y. Yamamoto","doi":"10.14359/6032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-strength and high-fluidity lightweight concretes have been developed using silica fume blended cement and belite-rich cement with a designed compressive strength from 40 to 60 MPa. Test conditions and parameters were water-cement ratio of 0.22, 0.33 and 0.40, curing temperature of 5, 20 and 35 deg C, curing method of standard and sealed curing and 3 types of high-range AE water-reducing agent. Influences of above factors upon flow, flow time, compressive strength, permeability, pore size distribution and total pore volume were studied. The major findings of this study are as follows: (1) Compressive strength of silica fume blended cement concrete was higher than that of belite-rich cement concrete and the effect of water-cement ratio was small. Compressive strength at 7 days was 80 to 90% of the 28-day strength at any curing temperature. (2) Compressive strength of belite-rich cement concrete significantly increased at water-cement ratio of 0.3 to 0.4, and its evolution from 28 to 91 days became larger at lower curing temperatures. (3) Total pore volume of silica fume blended cement concrete at the age of 28 days was smaller than that of belite-rich cement concrete at all curing temperatures of 5, 20 and 35 deg C, and compressive strength became larger with a decrease of total pore volume.","PeriodicalId":255305,"journal":{"name":"SP-179: Fourth CANMET/ACI/JCI Conference: Advances in Concrete Technology","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-179: Fourth CANMET/ACI/JCI Conference: Advances in Concrete Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/6032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

High-strength and high-fluidity lightweight concretes have been developed using silica fume blended cement and belite-rich cement with a designed compressive strength from 40 to 60 MPa. Test conditions and parameters were water-cement ratio of 0.22, 0.33 and 0.40, curing temperature of 5, 20 and 35 deg C, curing method of standard and sealed curing and 3 types of high-range AE water-reducing agent. Influences of above factors upon flow, flow time, compressive strength, permeability, pore size distribution and total pore volume were studied. The major findings of this study are as follows: (1) Compressive strength of silica fume blended cement concrete was higher than that of belite-rich cement concrete and the effect of water-cement ratio was small. Compressive strength at 7 days was 80 to 90% of the 28-day strength at any curing temperature. (2) Compressive strength of belite-rich cement concrete significantly increased at water-cement ratio of 0.3 to 0.4, and its evolution from 28 to 91 days became larger at lower curing temperatures. (3) Total pore volume of silica fume blended cement concrete at the age of 28 days was smaller than that of belite-rich cement concrete at all curing temperatures of 5, 20 and 35 deg C, and compressive strength became larger with a decrease of total pore volume.
高强高流动性轻量混凝土的性能研究
高强度、高流动性轻质混凝土采用硅灰混合水泥和富白铁矿水泥,设计抗压强度为40 ~ 60mpa。试验条件和参数为水灰比0.22、0.33和0.40,养护温度5℃、20℃和35℃,养护方式为标准养护和密封养护,3种高范围AE减水剂。研究了上述因素对流量、流动时间、抗压强度、渗透率、孔径分布和总孔容的影响。主要研究结果如下:(1)硅灰掺合水泥混凝土的抗压强度高于富白石水泥混凝土,水灰比的影响较小。在任何养护温度下,7天的抗压强度为28天强度的80 ~ 90%。(2)水灰比为0.3 ~ 0.4时,富白石水泥混凝土的抗压强度显著提高,且在较低养护温度下,其28 ~ 91 d的演化幅度更大。(3)在养护温度为5℃、20℃和35℃时,硅灰掺合水泥混凝土28天龄期的总孔隙体积均小于富白石水泥混凝土,抗压强度随着总孔隙体积的减小而增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信