An Exploratory Study Mapping Approaches to Teaching Writing in Engineering

M. Paretti, Catherine G. P. Berdanier, M. Gustafsson
{"title":"An Exploratory Study Mapping Approaches to Teaching Writing in Engineering","authors":"M. Paretti, Catherine G. P. Berdanier, M. Gustafsson","doi":"10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approaches to teaching writing to engineers vary widely across institutions, from standalone courses housed in English departments to fully integrated writing-in-the-disciplines programs, as well as a range of models in between that represent partnerships between writing and technical faculty. But little is known about how widely each approach is used, who is responsible for instruction, or what the overall goals are. In this exploratory study, we present an initial meta-analysis to map current approaches to engineering writing instruction by analyzing papers presented at American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conferences between 2012 and 2022. This exploratory study is a first step in a larger mapping project designed to better understand not only how engineering writing is taught and, perhaps more importantly, what approaches to engineering writing instruction are effective in what contexts and why. Such mapping can facilitate a deeper dialogues locally, nationally, and globally about the strengths and limitations of various approaches.","PeriodicalId":423952,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approaches to teaching writing to engineers vary widely across institutions, from standalone courses housed in English departments to fully integrated writing-in-the-disciplines programs, as well as a range of models in between that represent partnerships between writing and technical faculty. But little is known about how widely each approach is used, who is responsible for instruction, or what the overall goals are. In this exploratory study, we present an initial meta-analysis to map current approaches to engineering writing instruction by analyzing papers presented at American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conferences between 2012 and 2022. This exploratory study is a first step in a larger mapping project designed to better understand not only how engineering writing is taught and, perhaps more importantly, what approaches to engineering writing instruction are effective in what contexts and why. Such mapping can facilitate a deeper dialogues locally, nationally, and globally about the strengths and limitations of various approaches.
工科写作教学方法的探索性研究
不同院校的工程师写作教学方法差异很大,从英语系的独立课程到完全整合的学科写作课程,以及介于两者之间的一系列模式,这些模式代表了写作和技术教师之间的合作关系。但对于每种方法的使用范围、谁负责教学以及总体目标是什么,人们知之甚少。在这项探索性研究中,我们通过分析2012年至2022年美国工程教育学会(ASEE)会议上发表的论文,提出了一项初步的荟萃分析,以映射当前工程写作指导的方法。这项探索性研究是一个更大的测绘项目的第一步,该项目旨在更好地理解工程写作是如何教授的,也许更重要的是,在什么环境下,什么方法对工程写作教学有效,为什么有效。这种映射可以促进在地方、国家和全球就各种方法的优势和局限性进行更深入的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信