Us Regulators May Not Prevent Private Space Activity on the Basis of Article VI of the Outer Space Treaty

Laura Montgomery
{"title":"Us Regulators May Not Prevent Private Space Activity on the Basis of Article VI of the Outer Space Treaty","authors":"Laura Montgomery","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3169365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article VI of the Outer Space Treaty states that “the activities of non-governmental entities shall require authorization and continuing supervision.” This has caused confusion for the US government and for private entities that plan to operate in outer space engaging in nontraditional businesses such as satellite servicing or asteroid mining. Many interested parties believe Article VI means that private entities may not operate without governmental authorization and continuing supervision. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) suggests that Article VI gives it authority to deny access to space to the unauthorized and unsupervised. A clearer understanding of the law should put these concerns to rest. Article VI is not self-executing. This means that it is not enforceable federal law unless Congress enacts domestic implementing legislation. Therefore, private actors may operate in outer space, even without authorization or supervision, and the FAA and other regulatory agencies may not rely on Article VI to attempt to deny these actors access to space.","PeriodicalId":191678,"journal":{"name":"PSN: International Agreements/Treaties (Topic)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: International Agreements/Treaties (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3169365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Article VI of the Outer Space Treaty states that “the activities of non-governmental entities shall require authorization and continuing supervision.” This has caused confusion for the US government and for private entities that plan to operate in outer space engaging in nontraditional businesses such as satellite servicing or asteroid mining. Many interested parties believe Article VI means that private entities may not operate without governmental authorization and continuing supervision. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) suggests that Article VI gives it authority to deny access to space to the unauthorized and unsupervised. A clearer understanding of the law should put these concerns to rest. Article VI is not self-executing. This means that it is not enforceable federal law unless Congress enacts domestic implementing legislation. Therefore, private actors may operate in outer space, even without authorization or supervision, and the FAA and other regulatory agencies may not rely on Article VI to attempt to deny these actors access to space.
美国监管机构不能根据《外层空间条约》第六条阻止私人空间活动
《外层空间条约》第六条规定:“非政府实体的活动应得到授权和持续监督。”这给美国政府和计划在外层空间开展非传统业务(如卫星服务或小行星采矿)的私人实体带来了困惑。许多利益相关方认为,第六条意味着私营实体不得在没有政府授权和持续监督的情况下经营。美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)认为,第六条赋予了它拒绝未经授权和无人监督的人进入太空的权力。对法律有了更清晰的理解,这些担忧就会平息。第六条不是自动执行的。这意味着,除非国会颁布国内实施立法,否则它不是可执行的联邦法律。因此,即使没有授权或监督,私人行为者也可以在外太空活动,美国联邦航空局和其他监管机构不得依靠第六条来试图阻止这些行为者进入太空。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信