{"title":"ENTRE EL COMMON LAW Y EL CIVIL LAW DE FINALES DEL SIGLO XIX. RACIONALIDAD DEL DERECHO Y PREVISIBILIDAD EN WEBER","authors":"L. Marinoni","doi":"10.22370/rcs.2018.72.2177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"En las dos versiones del libro “La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo”, Weber, pretende dejar en claro que, así como los valores del protestantismo dieron origen a un modo de vivir que se identificó en el «espíritu» del capitalismo y contribuyeron a su desarrollo, se puede afirmar que dichos valores favorecieron un modo de vida racional y la racionalización del derecho. Sin embargo, Weber no identificó dicha racionalidad jurídica formal con previsibilidad, sino que, por el contrario, vio en el stare decisis un mecanismo capaz de propiciar previsibilidad a un derecho formalmente irracional, de tal forma que el common law, fuera capaz de garantizar, mediante el sistema de los precedentes obligatorios, un grado de previsibilidad que permitió el nacimiento del capitalismo. Constituyendo así, la oportunidad que Weber ofrece para demostrar que el stare decisis es un instrumento para lograr la previsibilidad en el derecho. \nIn the two versions of the book “The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism”, Weber intends to make it clear that, just as the values of Protestantism gave rise to a way of life that was identified in the «spirit» of capitalism and contributed to its development, it can be said that those values favoured a rational way of life and the rationalization of law. However, Weber did not identify such formal legal rationality with predictability, but, on the contrary, saw in stare decisis a mechanism capable of providing predictability to a formally irrational right, in such a way that common law, was able to guarantee, through the system of binding precedents, a degree of predictability that allowed the birth of capitalism. Thus constituting the opportunity offered by Weber to demonstrate that stare decisis is an instrument to achieve predictability in law.","PeriodicalId":358097,"journal":{"name":"YachaQ Revista de Derecho","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YachaQ Revista de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22370/rcs.2018.72.2177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
En las dos versiones del libro “La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo”, Weber, pretende dejar en claro que, así como los valores del protestantismo dieron origen a un modo de vivir que se identificó en el «espíritu» del capitalismo y contribuyeron a su desarrollo, se puede afirmar que dichos valores favorecieron un modo de vida racional y la racionalización del derecho. Sin embargo, Weber no identificó dicha racionalidad jurídica formal con previsibilidad, sino que, por el contrario, vio en el stare decisis un mecanismo capaz de propiciar previsibilidad a un derecho formalmente irracional, de tal forma que el common law, fuera capaz de garantizar, mediante el sistema de los precedentes obligatorios, un grado de previsibilidad que permitió el nacimiento del capitalismo. Constituyendo así, la oportunidad que Weber ofrece para demostrar que el stare decisis es un instrumento para lograr la previsibilidad en el derecho.
In the two versions of the book “The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism”, Weber intends to make it clear that, just as the values of Protestantism gave rise to a way of life that was identified in the «spirit» of capitalism and contributed to its development, it can be said that those values favoured a rational way of life and the rationalization of law. However, Weber did not identify such formal legal rationality with predictability, but, on the contrary, saw in stare decisis a mechanism capable of providing predictability to a formally irrational right, in such a way that common law, was able to guarantee, through the system of binding precedents, a degree of predictability that allowed the birth of capitalism. Thus constituting the opportunity offered by Weber to demonstrate that stare decisis is an instrument to achieve predictability in law.
在书的两个版本,“新教伦理和资本主义精神”,Weber,意在明确新教以及价值观,导致生活方式自称在«»的资本主义精神和发展做出了贡献,可以说,这些值这一边一个理性的生活方式和合理化。然而,Weber正式确定了该法律的合理性与可预测性,而是相反,stare decisis看到的机制能够促进可预测性非理性正式权利,普通法系统,能够确保通过强制性的先例,在一个程度的可预测性使资本主义的诞生。因此,韦伯提供了一个机会来证明凝视决策是实现法律可预见性的工具。In the two版本of the book”补救Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism”,Weber在听证会上to make it clear that just as the Protestantism价值观给了rise to a way of life that was确定In the«Spirit»of Capitalism and contributed to its发展,it can be said,这些价值观favoured rational way of life and the rationalization of law。然而,韦伯并没有正式确定此类法律rationality with predictability, but on the条约,saw in stare decisis机制密闭状况下可提供predictability to a正式irrational right, in a way that等普通法,阿斯玛保障法,through the system of binding precedents a degree of predictability that the生育of capitalism特权。因此,韦伯提供了一个机会来证明等待判决是实现法律可预见性的一种手段。