Methodological challenges of transnational environmental law

Elisa Morgera, Louisa Parks, Mika Schroeder
{"title":"Methodological challenges of transnational environmental law","authors":"Elisa Morgera, Louisa Parks, Mika Schroeder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3359597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This working paper will discuss the growing need for law students and researchers to develop, and to keep honing, specific skills to understand complex and increasingly frequent transnational phenomena in environmental law. The paper will then focus on three inter-related methodological challenges: comparison, empirics, and interdisciplinarity. These considerations will lead to a reflection on the nature of collaboration and research ethics, as well as on common constraints arising from research funding opportunities. In exploring these challenges, the paper builds upon the methodological insights from a 5-year collaborative and comparative research project on the legal concept of fair and equitable benefit-sharing (BENELEX) at different regulatory and geographical sites. The BENELEX project provided a practical understanding of the need for reflexivity and accountability for researchers interested in transnational environmental law phenomena, as well as an opportunity to collaboratively develop a transnational environmental law research project and carry it out through embedded peer-learning and supportive peer-review.","PeriodicalId":261686,"journal":{"name":"Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3359597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This working paper will discuss the growing need for law students and researchers to develop, and to keep honing, specific skills to understand complex and increasingly frequent transnational phenomena in environmental law. The paper will then focus on three inter-related methodological challenges: comparison, empirics, and interdisciplinarity. These considerations will lead to a reflection on the nature of collaboration and research ethics, as well as on common constraints arising from research funding opportunities. In exploring these challenges, the paper builds upon the methodological insights from a 5-year collaborative and comparative research project on the legal concept of fair and equitable benefit-sharing (BENELEX) at different regulatory and geographical sites. The BENELEX project provided a practical understanding of the need for reflexivity and accountability for researchers interested in transnational environmental law phenomena, as well as an opportunity to collaboratively develop a transnational environmental law research project and carry it out through embedded peer-learning and supportive peer-review.
跨国环境法的方法论挑战
这篇工作论文将讨论法律学生和研究人员日益需要发展和不断磨练特定技能,以理解环境法中复杂和日益频繁的跨国现象。然后,本文将关注三个相互关联的方法论挑战:比较、经验和跨学科性。这些考虑将导致对合作和研究伦理的本质的反思,以及对研究资助机会产生的共同限制的反思。在探索这些挑战的过程中,本文以一项为期5年的合作和比较研究项目的方法论见解为基础,该项目研究了不同监管和地理地点的公平和公平利益分享(BENELEX)的法律概念。BENELEX项目为对跨国环境法现象感兴趣的研究人员提供了对反思性和问责制需求的实际理解,以及合作开发跨国环境法研究项目的机会,并通过嵌入式同行学习和支持性同行评审来实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信