Revisiting the Missing Theories of Organizational Justice

A. Shah, A. Chishti, Zeeshan Zeb Khattak
{"title":"Revisiting the Missing Theories of Organizational Justice","authors":"A. Shah, A. Chishti, Zeeshan Zeb Khattak","doi":"10.22547/ber/13.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational justice (OJ) literature focuses on the well-established theories of OJ dimensions (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justices) and the relative significance of different OJ dimensions on dependent variables (Ambrose & Schminke, 2009). However, literature suggest an equal focus on relevant missing theories of justice to have a complete understanding of this concept. The researchers assume that the inclusion of relevant missing theories in their respective OJ dimensions would yield better results. They used two data sets to test this assumption. One data set, include well-established theories using Colquitt (2001) scale, while the second data set include well-established theories along with the relevant missing theories, such as, external equity, equality, and need etc. They concluded that with the incorporation of relevant missing theories in their respective OJ dimensions; overall, results improved in terms of diagnostic statistics including specifically t-statistics (p-values), F-statistics and R2; however, missing theories claim has not been substantiated.","PeriodicalId":210967,"journal":{"name":"Business & Economic Review","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business & Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22547/ber/13.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational justice (OJ) literature focuses on the well-established theories of OJ dimensions (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justices) and the relative significance of different OJ dimensions on dependent variables (Ambrose & Schminke, 2009). However, literature suggest an equal focus on relevant missing theories of justice to have a complete understanding of this concept. The researchers assume that the inclusion of relevant missing theories in their respective OJ dimensions would yield better results. They used two data sets to test this assumption. One data set, include well-established theories using Colquitt (2001) scale, while the second data set include well-established theories along with the relevant missing theories, such as, external equity, equality, and need etc. They concluded that with the incorporation of relevant missing theories in their respective OJ dimensions; overall, results improved in terms of diagnostic statistics including specifically t-statistics (p-values), F-statistics and R2; however, missing theories claim has not been substantiated.
重新审视缺失的组织公正理论
组织公正(organization justice, OJ)的相关文献主要关注已建立的OJ维度(分配公平、程序公平、人际公平和信息公平)理论,以及不同OJ维度对因变量的相对显著性(Ambrose & Schminke, 2009)。然而,文献建议同样关注相关缺失的正义理论,以全面理解这一概念。研究人员认为,在各自的OJ维度中包含相关的缺失理论会产生更好的结果。他们使用了两组数据来验证这一假设。一个数据集,包括使用Colquitt(2001)量表的成熟理论,而第二个数据集包括成熟的理论以及相关的缺失理论,如外部公平,平等和需求等。他们的结论是,将相关缺失的理论纳入各自的OJ维度;总体而言,结果在诊断统计方面有所改善,包括具体的t统计量(p值),f统计量和R2;然而,失踪理论的说法尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信