Conclusion

T. Pickles
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"T. Pickles","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198818779.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Conclusion returns to the two broader historiographical contexts set out in the Introduction—the process of conversion and the organization of the Anglo-Saxon church—to bring out the contributions of this study. Though it is impossible to address the wide range of anthropological, sociological, historical, and archaeological studies of conversion across time and space, the Conclusion considers the arguments in light of those studies that have been influential in histories of Anglo-Saxon conversion and in light of two significant sociological reviews of conversion. Though the Introduction establishes that this should not be considered a defence or vindication of the ‘minster hypothesis’, the Conclusion highlights those areas where this study has offered new perspectives on the organization of the church in Anglo-Saxon England.","PeriodicalId":190591,"journal":{"name":"Kingship, Society, and the Church in Anglo-Saxon Yorkshire","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kingship, Society, and the Church in Anglo-Saxon Yorkshire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198818779.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Conclusion returns to the two broader historiographical contexts set out in the Introduction—the process of conversion and the organization of the Anglo-Saxon church—to bring out the contributions of this study. Though it is impossible to address the wide range of anthropological, sociological, historical, and archaeological studies of conversion across time and space, the Conclusion considers the arguments in light of those studies that have been influential in histories of Anglo-Saxon conversion and in light of two significant sociological reviews of conversion. Though the Introduction establishes that this should not be considered a defence or vindication of the ‘minster hypothesis’, the Conclusion highlights those areas where this study has offered new perspectives on the organization of the church in Anglo-Saxon England.
结论
结语部分回归到引言中所述的两个更广泛的史学背景——皈依的过程和盎格鲁-撒克逊教会的组织——以引出本研究的贡献。虽然不可能跨越时间和空间来讨论广泛的人类学、社会学、历史学和考古学的皈依研究,但结语部分根据那些对盎格鲁-撒克逊人皈依历史有影响的研究以及对皈依的两项重要社会学评论来考虑这些论点。虽然引言确立了这不应被视为对“牧师假说”的辩护或辩护,但结论强调了本研究为盎格鲁-撒克逊英格兰教会组织提供新视角的那些领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信