Optimization of sepsis risk assessment for ward patients

S. Mitchell, K. Schinkel, Yifeng Song, Yuanbo Wang, J. Ainsworth, Travis Halbert, Stephen Strong, Jinghe Zhang, C. Moore, Laura E. Barnes
{"title":"Optimization of sepsis risk assessment for ward patients","authors":"S. Mitchell, K. Schinkel, Yifeng Song, Yuanbo Wang, J. Ainsworth, Travis Halbert, Stephen Strong, Jinghe Zhang, C. Moore, Laura E. Barnes","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2016.7489280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis is the systemic response to infection complicated by organ dysfunction. It is a leading cause of in-hospital mortality, with an observed mortality of 20-40%, and is associated with significantly high costs. Furthermore, patients who survive sepsis are more likely to have permanent organ damage, cognitive impairment and physical disability. Survival from sepsis is dependent on early and targeted treatment. Accepted methods for identifying and predicting sepsis have typically been based on intensive care unit (ICU) patients and founded upon a limited and outdated definition of sepsis based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria - one which is not clinically validated and shown to miss at least 1 out of 8 cases. Recently updated consensus guidelines on sepsis have been published and offer the possibility of improved EWS and predictive models. Our goal was to identify non-ICU ward patients with sepsis earlier and more accurately using the newly established sepsis definition and improved predictive models. Using multivariate logistic regression and routinely available physiological and laboratory data from electronic health records (EHRs), we derived an EWS that identifies at-risk ward patients 12-24 hours prior to sepsis onset with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) result of 74%. This model, when applied on a separate ICU population, achieved an AUC curve result of 56%, indicating the model has worse performance in this setting.","PeriodicalId":426864,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2016.7489280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Sepsis is the systemic response to infection complicated by organ dysfunction. It is a leading cause of in-hospital mortality, with an observed mortality of 20-40%, and is associated with significantly high costs. Furthermore, patients who survive sepsis are more likely to have permanent organ damage, cognitive impairment and physical disability. Survival from sepsis is dependent on early and targeted treatment. Accepted methods for identifying and predicting sepsis have typically been based on intensive care unit (ICU) patients and founded upon a limited and outdated definition of sepsis based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria - one which is not clinically validated and shown to miss at least 1 out of 8 cases. Recently updated consensus guidelines on sepsis have been published and offer the possibility of improved EWS and predictive models. Our goal was to identify non-ICU ward patients with sepsis earlier and more accurately using the newly established sepsis definition and improved predictive models. Using multivariate logistic regression and routinely available physiological and laboratory data from electronic health records (EHRs), we derived an EWS that identifies at-risk ward patients 12-24 hours prior to sepsis onset with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) result of 74%. This model, when applied on a separate ICU population, achieved an AUC curve result of 56%, indicating the model has worse performance in this setting.
病房患者脓毒症风险评估的优化
脓毒症是对感染并发器官功能障碍的全身反应。它是院内死亡的主要原因,观察到的死亡率为20-40%,并且与显著的高费用相关。此外,存活下来的败血症患者更有可能出现永久性器官损伤、认知障碍和身体残疾。脓毒症的生存取决于早期和有针对性的治疗。公认的识别和预测脓毒症的方法通常是基于重症监护病房(ICU)患者,并建立在基于全身性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准的有限和过时的脓毒症定义上,该定义未经临床验证,并且在8例中至少有1例漏诊。最近更新的脓毒症共识指南已经出版,并提供了改进EWS和预测模型的可能性。我们的目标是使用新建立的脓毒症定义和改进的预测模型,更早、更准确地识别非icu病房脓毒症患者。利用多变量逻辑回归和电子健康记录(EHRs)中常规可用的生理和实验室数据,我们得出了一个EWS,该EWS在败血症发作前12-24小时识别有风险的病房患者,其接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)结果下面积为74%。当将该模型应用于单独的ICU人群时,AUC曲线结果为56%,表明该模型在此设置下的性能较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信