6. Possessives and relational nouns

C. Barker
{"title":"6. Possessives and relational nouns","authors":"C. Barker","doi":"10.1515/9783110589443-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article concentrates on nominal possessives (John’s friend) rather than on verbal possessives (John has a friend). In John’s friend, John is the possessor, and friend describes the entity possessed (the possessee). Nominal possessives constitute a major construction type in the languages of the world. In contrast with a sortal noun (e.g., person), friend is a (two-place) relational noun: a person counts as a friend only in virtue of standing in a particular relationship with another individual. Relational nouns are an important element in the study of possessives because the content of a possessive typically, perhaps characteristically, depends on the content of a relational nominal. Possessives provide particularly compelling support for type shifting as a general principle of syntactic and semantic composition. Possessives also inform debates involving definiteness, binding, and a number of other semantic phenomena. Some bibliographic notes: Partee 1997, an influential analysis of the possessive, first circulated in manuscript form around 1983, though by 1990 my attempts to get hold of a copy were not successful. My 1991 dissertation, published in 1995, provides a general introduction to nominal possessives and relational nouns. Taylor 1996 and Heine 1997 are book-length treatments in the Cognitive Grammar tradition. There is a literature in French, discussed in Dobrovie-Sorin 2000a with special attention to the contributions of Milner. Peters and Westerstal 2006: chapter 7 covers much of the same ground as this article from a different point of view, and Coene and d’Hulst 2003 and Kim et al. 2004 contain a number of studies discussing the syntax and semantics of possessives. Some works specific to possessives are available at semanticsarchive.net/links.html, notably bibliographies and other resources compiled by Yury Lander and by Barbara Partee.","PeriodicalId":234247,"journal":{"name":"Semantics - Noun Phrases and Verb Phrases","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semantics - Noun Phrases and Verb Phrases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110589443-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article concentrates on nominal possessives (John’s friend) rather than on verbal possessives (John has a friend). In John’s friend, John is the possessor, and friend describes the entity possessed (the possessee). Nominal possessives constitute a major construction type in the languages of the world. In contrast with a sortal noun (e.g., person), friend is a (two-place) relational noun: a person counts as a friend only in virtue of standing in a particular relationship with another individual. Relational nouns are an important element in the study of possessives because the content of a possessive typically, perhaps characteristically, depends on the content of a relational nominal. Possessives provide particularly compelling support for type shifting as a general principle of syntactic and semantic composition. Possessives also inform debates involving definiteness, binding, and a number of other semantic phenomena. Some bibliographic notes: Partee 1997, an influential analysis of the possessive, first circulated in manuscript form around 1983, though by 1990 my attempts to get hold of a copy were not successful. My 1991 dissertation, published in 1995, provides a general introduction to nominal possessives and relational nouns. Taylor 1996 and Heine 1997 are book-length treatments in the Cognitive Grammar tradition. There is a literature in French, discussed in Dobrovie-Sorin 2000a with special attention to the contributions of Milner. Peters and Westerstal 2006: chapter 7 covers much of the same ground as this article from a different point of view, and Coene and d’Hulst 2003 and Kim et al. 2004 contain a number of studies discussing the syntax and semantics of possessives. Some works specific to possessives are available at semanticsarchive.net/links.html, notably bibliographies and other resources compiled by Yury Lander and by Barbara Partee.
6. 所有格和关系名词
这篇文章关注的是名义所有格(约翰的朋友)而不是言语所有格(约翰有一个朋友)。在约翰的朋友中,约翰是占有者,而朋友描述被占有的实体(占有者)。名词所有格是世界语言中的一种主要结构类型。与排序名词(例如,人)相比,friend是一个(两个位置)关系名词:一个人只有在与另一个人的特殊关系中才能被视为朋友。关系名词是研究所有格的一个重要元素,因为所有格的内容通常取决于关系名词的内容。所有格作为句法和语义组合的一般原则,为类型转换提供了特别引人注目的支持。所有格也会引起关于确定性、绑定和其他一些语义现象的争论。一些参考书目注释:parte 1997,一篇对所有格的有影响力的分析,在1983年左右以手稿形式首次流传,尽管到1990年我试图得到一份副本没有成功。我1991年的论文,发表于1995年,提供了名义所有格和关系名词的一般介绍。Taylor 1996年和Heine 1997年是认知语法传统的著作。在Dobrovie-Sorin 2000a中讨论了法语文献,特别关注了米尔纳的贡献。Peters and Westerstal 2006:第7章从不同的角度涵盖了与本文相同的大部分内容,Coene and d 'Hulst 2003和Kim et al. 2004包含了许多关于所有格语法和语义的研究。一些关于所有格的具体作品可以在semanticsarchive.net/links.html上找到,特别是由Yury Lander和Barbara parte编写的参考书目和其他资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信