Long-term investment, the cost of capital and the dividend and buyback puzzle

A. Blundell-Wignall, Caroline Roulet
{"title":"Long-term investment, the cost of capital and the dividend and buyback puzzle","authors":"A. Blundell-Wignall, Caroline Roulet","doi":"10.1787/FMT-2013-5K41Z8T05L8S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper argues that interest rates are at extremely low levels to support banks, and the search for yield has pushed the liquidity driven speculative bubble from real estate, derivatives and structured products markets into the corporate debt market. Equities have rallied strongly too. This asset cycle is certainly helping banks reduce hidden losses on illiquid securities and could also help reduce the cost of equity. But for this to occur at current bond yields would require an unrealistic bubble in equities. Markets are assuming that this transition from low to higher rates (more in line with nominal GDP) can be handled smoothly by policy makers, when in fact this may not be so. Extreme volatility would risk new financial fragility problems. The paper presents a panel model using more than 4 000 global companies and shows that the Capex decision in general depend on the cost of equity, the accelerator and uncertainty, whereas buybacks are driven mainly by the gap between the cost of equity and debt. Right now the incentive structure implied by very low interest rates, which may be sustained for a long time, together with tax incentives, works directly against longterm investment. Debt finance is cheap, while the cost of equity capital needed for risky long-term investment is still high. This combination provides a direct incentive for borrowing to carry out buybacks (de-equitisation). Noting that weak investment reduces potential GDP, the paper makes some policy suggestions. JEL Classification: G15, G32, G28, E52. Keywords: Long-term investment, interest rates, de-equitisation, cost of capital, dividend and buybacks, monetary policy.","PeriodicalId":444795,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal: Financial Market Trends","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal: Financial Market Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/FMT-2013-5K41Z8T05L8S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The paper argues that interest rates are at extremely low levels to support banks, and the search for yield has pushed the liquidity driven speculative bubble from real estate, derivatives and structured products markets into the corporate debt market. Equities have rallied strongly too. This asset cycle is certainly helping banks reduce hidden losses on illiquid securities and could also help reduce the cost of equity. But for this to occur at current bond yields would require an unrealistic bubble in equities. Markets are assuming that this transition from low to higher rates (more in line with nominal GDP) can be handled smoothly by policy makers, when in fact this may not be so. Extreme volatility would risk new financial fragility problems. The paper presents a panel model using more than 4 000 global companies and shows that the Capex decision in general depend on the cost of equity, the accelerator and uncertainty, whereas buybacks are driven mainly by the gap between the cost of equity and debt. Right now the incentive structure implied by very low interest rates, which may be sustained for a long time, together with tax incentives, works directly against longterm investment. Debt finance is cheap, while the cost of equity capital needed for risky long-term investment is still high. This combination provides a direct incentive for borrowing to carry out buybacks (de-equitisation). Noting that weak investment reduces potential GDP, the paper makes some policy suggestions. JEL Classification: G15, G32, G28, E52. Keywords: Long-term investment, interest rates, de-equitisation, cost of capital, dividend and buybacks, monetary policy.
长期投资、资金成本以及分红和回购的难题
本文认为,利率处于极低水平以支持银行,而对收益的追求将流动性驱动的投机泡沫从房地产、衍生品和结构性产品市场推向了公司债券市场。股市也强劲反弹。这种资产周期肯定有助于银行减少非流动性证券的隐性损失,也可能有助于降低股本成本。但以目前的债券收益率来看,这需要股市出现不切实际的泡沫。市场认为,政策制定者可以顺利地处理从低利率到高利率(更符合名义GDP)的转变,但实际上可能并非如此。极端的波动可能会带来新的金融脆弱性问题。本文提出了一个使用4000多家全球公司的面板模型,并表明资本支出决策通常取决于股权成本、加速器和不确定性,而回购主要由股权成本和债务成本之间的差距驱动。目前,可能会持续很长一段时间的极低利率所隐含的激励结构,加上税收激励,直接不利于长期投资。债务融资成本很低,而高风险长期投资所需的股权资本成本仍然很高。这种组合为借款进行回购(去股权化)提供了直接激励。注意到投资疲软降低了潜在GDP,本文提出了一些政策建议。JEL分类:G15、G32、G28、E52。关键词:长期投资,利率,去股份化,资金成本,股利和回购,货币政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信