Plurality of expert knowledge: public planners’ experience with urban contractualism in Amsterdam

T. Taşan-Kok, M. van den Hurk
{"title":"Plurality of expert knowledge: public planners’ experience with urban contractualism in Amsterdam","authors":"T. Taşan-Kok, M. van den Hurk","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447345244.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on the Dutch planning experience in understanding how planners, as government actors, learn to deal with contracts in complex partnerships with private sector actors. It does so in order to question the technocratic logics of contemporary public–private partnerships (PPPs) focusing on an institutional context where public governments still retain a major leading role in planning for urban development but increasingly operate by devising financial agreements with the private sector. This chapter specifically looks at the use of ‘contracts’ in urban development. Consensus building in the Netherlands is the key approach in any decision-making process, implemented through the ‘polder model’, which is defined as harmonious patterns of interaction between social partners. The Dutch experience demonstrates very clearly that the ways of deal making, and the mechanism of checks and balances in this process, are very dynamic and reflect the changing dynamics of urban governance. This also means that public planners, very consciously, try to reposition themselves to safeguard the public interest.","PeriodicalId":336977,"journal":{"name":"Planning and Knowledge","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447345244.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the Dutch planning experience in understanding how planners, as government actors, learn to deal with contracts in complex partnerships with private sector actors. It does so in order to question the technocratic logics of contemporary public–private partnerships (PPPs) focusing on an institutional context where public governments still retain a major leading role in planning for urban development but increasingly operate by devising financial agreements with the private sector. This chapter specifically looks at the use of ‘contracts’ in urban development. Consensus building in the Netherlands is the key approach in any decision-making process, implemented through the ‘polder model’, which is defined as harmonious patterns of interaction between social partners. The Dutch experience demonstrates very clearly that the ways of deal making, and the mechanism of checks and balances in this process, are very dynamic and reflect the changing dynamics of urban governance. This also means that public planners, very consciously, try to reposition themselves to safeguard the public interest.
专业知识的多元性:阿姆斯特丹城市契约主义的公共规划师经验
本章重点介绍荷兰的规划经验,以了解作为政府行为者的规划者如何在与私营部门行为者的复杂伙伴关系中学习处理合同。它这样做是为了质疑当代公私伙伴关系(ppp)的技术官僚逻辑,其重点是公共政府在城市发展规划中仍然保持主要主导作用,但越来越多地通过与私营部门制定金融协议来运作。本章特别关注“契约”在城市发展中的应用。在荷兰,建立共识是任何决策过程中的关键方法,通过“圩区模式”实施,该模式被定义为社会伙伴之间互动的和谐模式。荷兰的经验非常清楚地表明,交易的方式以及这一过程中的制衡机制是非常动态的,反映了城市治理不断变化的动态。这也意味着公共规划师非常有意识地试图重新定位自己,以维护公共利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信