Pre-service Teachers’ Cognitive or Non-Cognitive Preferences: Variance in the Learning Strategies from the Lenses of Gender Category in Balochistan, Pakistan

Tanzeela Arooj, Iqra Ameer, Muhammad Kamran
{"title":"Pre-service Teachers’ Cognitive or Non-Cognitive Preferences: Variance in the Learning Strategies from the Lenses of Gender Category in Balochistan, Pakistan","authors":"Tanzeela Arooj, Iqra Ameer, Muhammad Kamran","doi":"10.54183/jssr.v2i4.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Male and female students’ choices always matter when it comes to the selection of any profession or any kind of strategy that is why our study is of supreme importance. This study was conducted to make sure that male students select different learning strategies for their lecture than female students and vice versa. The study was conducted in the Department of Education at the University of Loralai in Balochistan. It was a descriptive (a type of quantitative) research design for which participants were randomly selected through a simple random selection technique. For gender-wise comparison, 101 were male while 56 were female students who filled out and returned the questionnaires. The scale adopted by us from Jimenez et al. (2018) had 17 items in total which were spread in three dimensions i.e., micro-learning strategy (MLS; 05 items; α=0.83), keys for memory and metacognition learning strategy (KMMLS; 05 items; α= 0.65) and emotional social support learning strategy (ESSLS; 07 items; α= 0.61). The total Cronbach α of the scale was also in a highly acceptable range (α=0.84) achieved through running a pilot study of 09 respondents. For validation of the scale, we relied on factor analysis run in previous studies (e.g., Jimenez et al. 2018). The results proved that the students had to use always all three types of learning strategies when they have to learn their lectures. Upon testing of hypotheses, significant differences were found only in the keys for memory and metacognition learning strategy, and overall learning strategies, which further revealed that males had higher mean scores than female students. It then concludes that male students prefer cognitive learning strategies for lecture learning. The results were discussed in the views of current and past literature and suggestions were given based on the results.","PeriodicalId":320360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Sciences Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Sciences Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v2i4.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Male and female students’ choices always matter when it comes to the selection of any profession or any kind of strategy that is why our study is of supreme importance. This study was conducted to make sure that male students select different learning strategies for their lecture than female students and vice versa. The study was conducted in the Department of Education at the University of Loralai in Balochistan. It was a descriptive (a type of quantitative) research design for which participants were randomly selected through a simple random selection technique. For gender-wise comparison, 101 were male while 56 were female students who filled out and returned the questionnaires. The scale adopted by us from Jimenez et al. (2018) had 17 items in total which were spread in three dimensions i.e., micro-learning strategy (MLS; 05 items; α=0.83), keys for memory and metacognition learning strategy (KMMLS; 05 items; α= 0.65) and emotional social support learning strategy (ESSLS; 07 items; α= 0.61). The total Cronbach α of the scale was also in a highly acceptable range (α=0.84) achieved through running a pilot study of 09 respondents. For validation of the scale, we relied on factor analysis run in previous studies (e.g., Jimenez et al. 2018). The results proved that the students had to use always all three types of learning strategies when they have to learn their lectures. Upon testing of hypotheses, significant differences were found only in the keys for memory and metacognition learning strategy, and overall learning strategies, which further revealed that males had higher mean scores than female students. It then concludes that male students prefer cognitive learning strategies for lecture learning. The results were discussed in the views of current and past literature and suggestions were given based on the results.
巴基斯坦俾路支省职前教师的认知或非认知偏好:性别范畴视角下的学习策略差异
当涉及到任何职业或任何一种策略的选择时,男女学生的选择总是很重要,这就是为什么我们的研究是至关重要的。本研究是为了确定男学生选择不同的学习策略与女学生,反之亦然。这项研究是在俾路支省的罗拉莱大学教育系进行的。这是一个描述性(一种定量)的研究设计,参与者是通过简单的随机选择技术随机选择的。在性别方面,101名男生和56名女生填写并上交了调查问卷。Jimenez et al.(2018)采用的量表共有17个项目,分布在三个维度上,即微学习策略(MLS;05年项目;α=0.83),记忆键和元认知学习策略(KMMLS;05年项目;α= 0.65)和情绪社会支持学习策略(ESSLS;07年项目;α= 0.61)。量表的总Cronbach α也在一个高度可接受的范围内(α=0.84),通过对09名受访者进行初步研究实现。为了验证量表,我们依赖于先前研究中运行的因子分析(例如,Jimenez et al. 2018)。结果证明,当学生必须学习讲课时,他们必须使用所有三种学习策略。在假设检验中,仅在记忆和元认知学习策略关键项和整体学习策略方面存在显著差异,进一步揭示了男生的平均分高于女生。结果表明,男生在课堂学习中更倾向于采用认知学习策略。对研究结果进行了综述,并提出了相应的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信