Collectives, Communities and Non-Hierarchical Modes of Creation from the 1970s till the 1990s

Tomaž Toporišič
{"title":"Collectives, Communities and Non-Hierarchical Modes of Creation from the 1970s till the 1990s","authors":"Tomaž Toporišič","doi":"10.51937/amfiteater-2021-1/18-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the twenty-year period that coincides with the first twenty years of the Glej Theatre, the essay concentrates on the formation and transformations of non-hierarchical theatre communities, or, in the words of one of its founders, Dušan Jovanović, theatrical tribes. Using historical and present-day examples, the author will try to map the specific devised theatrical procedures producing what Badiou names “a generic vacillation”: “Theatre turns every representation, every actor’s gesture, into a generic vacillation so as to put differences to the test without any supporting base. The spectator must decide whether to expose himself to this void, whether to share in the infinite procedure. He is summoned, not to experience pleasure (which arrives perhaps ‘on top of everything’, as Aristotle says) but to think” (Rhapsody, 124).The essay strives to answer the following questions: How did the Slovenian experimental and non-institutional performing arts scene (as a reaction to the hierarchical structure of repertory theatres) create different non-hierarchical modes in relation to creating the performances, the theatre’s artistic direction and forming temporary communities with emancipated audiences? To which models did this scene turn – then and today – to develop its own logic of devised and collaborative theatrical tactics? And lately: To what extent have those different artistic collaborative tribes changed the theatrical landscape in Slovenia, Yugoslavia and elsewhere?","PeriodicalId":347236,"journal":{"name":"Theatre and Community","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theatre and Community","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51937/amfiteater-2021-1/18-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the twenty-year period that coincides with the first twenty years of the Glej Theatre, the essay concentrates on the formation and transformations of non-hierarchical theatre communities, or, in the words of one of its founders, Dušan Jovanović, theatrical tribes. Using historical and present-day examples, the author will try to map the specific devised theatrical procedures producing what Badiou names “a generic vacillation”: “Theatre turns every representation, every actor’s gesture, into a generic vacillation so as to put differences to the test without any supporting base. The spectator must decide whether to expose himself to this void, whether to share in the infinite procedure. He is summoned, not to experience pleasure (which arrives perhaps ‘on top of everything’, as Aristotle says) but to think” (Rhapsody, 124).The essay strives to answer the following questions: How did the Slovenian experimental and non-institutional performing arts scene (as a reaction to the hierarchical structure of repertory theatres) create different non-hierarchical modes in relation to creating the performances, the theatre’s artistic direction and forming temporary communities with emancipated audiences? To which models did this scene turn – then and today – to develop its own logic of devised and collaborative theatrical tactics? And lately: To what extent have those different artistic collaborative tribes changed the theatrical landscape in Slovenia, Yugoslavia and elsewhere?
20世纪70年代至90年代的集体、社区与非等级创作模式
在与Glej剧院的头二十年相一致的二十年期间,本文集中于非等级戏剧社区的形成和转变,或者,用其创始人之一Dušan jovanovigi的话来说,戏剧部落。作者将利用历史和现代的例子,试图描绘出产生巴迪欧所称的“一种一般性的摇摆”的具体设计的戏剧程序:“戏剧将每一种表现、每一个演员的手势都变成一种一般性的摇摆,以便在没有任何支持基础的情况下检验差异。”观众必须决定是否将自己暴露在这种空虚中,是否分享无限的过程。他被召唤,不是去体验快乐(正如亚里士多德所说,快乐可能‘凌驾于一切之上’),而是去思考”(狂想曲,124)。本文力求回答以下问题:斯洛文尼亚的实验和非机构表演艺术场景(作为对保留剧目的等级结构的反应)如何在创作表演、剧院的艺术方向和与解放的观众组成临时社区方面创造不同的非等级模式?这个场景——当时和今天——转向了哪些模型来发展自己的设计和协作戏剧策略的逻辑?最近:这些不同的艺术合作部落在多大程度上改变了斯洛文尼亚、南斯拉夫和其他地方的戏剧景观?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信