Beginning to Understand the Cost-effectiveness of Andexxa

M. Haque, M. Gratson, Jodi Woerle, Fitz Tavernier Jr
{"title":"Beginning to Understand the Cost-effectiveness of Andexxa","authors":"M. Haque, M. Gratson, Jodi Woerle, Fitz Tavernier Jr","doi":"10.52504/001c.7777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"**Introduction:** Tens of thousands of patients die of major life-threatening bleeds every year while taking direct factor Xa inhibitors, a class of anticoagulant medications that until now had no reversal agent. In May 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration approved andexanet alfa (Andexxa), the first known reversal agent for a subset of direct factor Xa inhibitors. It has been reported to substantially reduce mortality rates for patients who experience a major bleed while taking rivaroxaban or apixaban. Andexxa is costly, however, ranging between US $24,750 and $49,500 for treatment. \n**Methods:** To explore the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa, a Markov model was generated using existing Andexxa trial data and related literature. Multiple 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were also constructed to delineate the impact Andexxa would need to have on mortality rates and health-related quality of life to meet the willingness-to-pay thresholds ranging between $50,000 and $150,000. The model included a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 65 years at an increased risk of stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and with no contraindication to anticoagulation. \n**Results:** The Markov model showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Andexxa over the standard of care is $211,056 for an intracranial hemorrhage and $40,718 for a gastrointestinal bleed. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that while Andexxa may be cost-effective to treat gastrointestinal bleeds, medication trial data will likely need to show significant impact on a patient’s quality of life and relative risk of death following an intracranial bleed to be cost-effective. \n**Discussion:** Although the application of these findings is restricted due to limited trial data, beginning to understand the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa provides policymakers important insight into the economic value of the intervention.","PeriodicalId":340325,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Medical Review","volume":"48 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Medical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52504/001c.7777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

**Introduction:** Tens of thousands of patients die of major life-threatening bleeds every year while taking direct factor Xa inhibitors, a class of anticoagulant medications that until now had no reversal agent. In May 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration approved andexanet alfa (Andexxa), the first known reversal agent for a subset of direct factor Xa inhibitors. It has been reported to substantially reduce mortality rates for patients who experience a major bleed while taking rivaroxaban or apixaban. Andexxa is costly, however, ranging between US $24,750 and $49,500 for treatment. **Methods:** To explore the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa, a Markov model was generated using existing Andexxa trial data and related literature. Multiple 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were also constructed to delineate the impact Andexxa would need to have on mortality rates and health-related quality of life to meet the willingness-to-pay thresholds ranging between $50,000 and $150,000. The model included a hypothetical cohort of patients aged 65 years at an increased risk of stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and with no contraindication to anticoagulation. **Results:** The Markov model showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Andexxa over the standard of care is $211,056 for an intracranial hemorrhage and $40,718 for a gastrointestinal bleed. Sensitivity analyses further indicated that while Andexxa may be cost-effective to treat gastrointestinal bleeds, medication trial data will likely need to show significant impact on a patient’s quality of life and relative risk of death following an intracranial bleed to be cost-effective. **Discussion:** Although the application of these findings is restricted due to limited trial data, beginning to understand the cost-effectiveness of Andexxa provides policymakers important insight into the economic value of the intervention.
开始了解Andexxa的成本效益
**简介:**每年有数以万计的患者死于危及生命的大出血而服用直接Xa因子抑制剂,这是一类抗凝药物,直到现在还没有逆转剂。2018年5月,美国食品和药物管理局(fda)批准了andexanet alfa (Andexxa),这是已知的第一个用于直接因子Xa抑制剂子集的逆转剂。据报道,服用利伐沙班或阿哌沙班时发生大出血的患者的死亡率大大降低。然而,Andexxa很昂贵,治疗费用在24,750美元到49,500美元之间。**方法:**利用已有的Andexxa试验数据和相关文献建立马尔可夫模型,探讨Andexxa的成本-效果。还构建了多个单向和双向敏感性分析,以描述Andexxa需要对死亡率和与健康相关的生活质量产生的影响,以达到5万至15万美元之间的支付意愿阈值。该模型包括一组年龄在65岁、因非瓣膜性心房颤动而卒中风险增加且无抗凝禁忌症的患者。**结果:** Markov模型显示,Andexxa相对于标准护理的增量成本-效果比,颅内出血为211,056美元,胃肠道出血为40,718美元。敏感性分析进一步表明,虽然Andexxa治疗胃肠道出血可能具有成本效益,但药物试验数据可能需要显示对患者生活质量和颅内出血后相对死亡风险的显著影响才能具有成本效益。**讨论:**尽管由于试验数据有限,这些发现的应用受到限制,但开始了解Andexxa的成本效益为政策制定者提供了对干预措施经济价值的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信