Induced resistance in pepper plants against root knot nematode by some inducers in relation to the histological changes

M. Sorial, M. Mahdy, H. Zawam, Azhar Aboayana, E. Mousa
{"title":"Induced resistance in pepper plants against root knot nematode by some inducers in relation to the histological changes","authors":"M. Sorial, M. Mahdy, H. Zawam, Azhar Aboayana, E. Mousa","doi":"10.21608/ejcp.2020.205590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biochemical and histological studies were made on roots of pepper (Capsicum annuum) infected with root-knot nematode and treated by certain chemical resistance inducers (salicylic acid (SA), indol acetic acid (IAA),ethylene (Eth), Jasmonic acid (JA), in addition to a biofertilizer named (Halex-2). These resistance inducers were tested at three concentrations 100, 200 and 300 μM for SA, IAA, and Eth and 15, 20 and 25 μM for JA while the biofertilizer was tested at 7g/L as biotic resistance inducers against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita under greenhouse conditions at the Faculty of Agriculture Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia University in season 2016. All concentrations of the tested inducers significantly reduced root-galling and nematode population in soil as well as the number of egg masses and developmental stages per root system. The greatest inhibition effect on reproduction of nematode was recorded with Eth at 300μM, which did not significantly differ from that of a nematicide-treated plants. Also, all treatments significantly enhanced all vegetative plant growth characters compared with the infected plants. Biochemical analysis showed a significant increase in the activity of antioxidant enzymes (peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase and catalase), total and reducing sugars, and total phenols at the highest concentration of the tested inducers, especially, Eth compared with the nematode-infested plants. Histological studies indicated that less giant cells were observed in almost all treatments compared to the nematode-infected control plants. However, the highest concentrations of IAA, Eth (300μM) and Halex-2 treatments showed a good performance, with no giant cells found. Sixty days after nematode inoculation, all treatments (except SA and Halex-2) showed a poor formation of regular giant cells divided from cytoplasm and contained less number of nuclei compared to the infected plants. It seems that the tested inducers could be recommended to control M. incognita on pepper plants. Thereby, decreases the costs and side effects of using nematicides.","PeriodicalId":168502,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Crop Protection","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejcp.2020.205590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Biochemical and histological studies were made on roots of pepper (Capsicum annuum) infected with root-knot nematode and treated by certain chemical resistance inducers (salicylic acid (SA), indol acetic acid (IAA),ethylene (Eth), Jasmonic acid (JA), in addition to a biofertilizer named (Halex-2). These resistance inducers were tested at three concentrations 100, 200 and 300 μM for SA, IAA, and Eth and 15, 20 and 25 μM for JA while the biofertilizer was tested at 7g/L as biotic resistance inducers against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita under greenhouse conditions at the Faculty of Agriculture Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia University in season 2016. All concentrations of the tested inducers significantly reduced root-galling and nematode population in soil as well as the number of egg masses and developmental stages per root system. The greatest inhibition effect on reproduction of nematode was recorded with Eth at 300μM, which did not significantly differ from that of a nematicide-treated plants. Also, all treatments significantly enhanced all vegetative plant growth characters compared with the infected plants. Biochemical analysis showed a significant increase in the activity of antioxidant enzymes (peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase and catalase), total and reducing sugars, and total phenols at the highest concentration of the tested inducers, especially, Eth compared with the nematode-infested plants. Histological studies indicated that less giant cells were observed in almost all treatments compared to the nematode-infected control plants. However, the highest concentrations of IAA, Eth (300μM) and Halex-2 treatments showed a good performance, with no giant cells found. Sixty days after nematode inoculation, all treatments (except SA and Halex-2) showed a poor formation of regular giant cells divided from cytoplasm and contained less number of nuclei compared to the infected plants. It seems that the tested inducers could be recommended to control M. incognita on pepper plants. Thereby, decreases the costs and side effects of using nematicides.
几种诱导剂诱导辣椒对根结线虫的抗性与组织学变化的关系
用水杨酸(SA)、吲哚乙酸(IAA)、乙烯(Eth)、茉莉酸(JA)和生物肥料(Halex-2)对根结线虫侵染辣椒(Capsicum annuum)根系进行了生化和组织学研究。2016季,在Menoufia大学Shebin El-Kom农业学院,对SA、IAA和Eth进行了100、200和300 μM浓度的抗性诱导剂试验,对JA进行了15、20和25 μM浓度的抗性诱导剂试验,并在温室条件下以7g/L的浓度对根结线虫进行了抗性诱导剂试验。所有浓度的诱导剂均显著降低了土壤中的根腐病和线虫数量,以及每个根系的卵团数和发育阶段。300μM的Eth对线虫繁殖的抑制作用最大,与杀线虫剂处理的效果无显著差异。与侵染植株相比,各处理均显著提高了植株的所有营养性状。生化分析表明,与线虫侵染植物相比,在最高浓度的诱导剂下,抗氧化酶(过氧化物酶、多酚氧化酶和过氧化氢酶)、总糖和还原糖以及总酚的活性显著增加,尤其是Eth。组织学研究表明,在几乎所有处理中,与线虫感染的对照植物相比,观察到的巨细胞较少。而最高浓度的IAA、Eth (300μM)和Halex-2处理均表现良好,未发现巨细胞。接种线虫60天后,除SA和Halex-2外,所有处理均显示与感染植株相比,细胞质分裂的规则巨细胞形成较差,细胞核数量较少。结果表明,该诱导剂可推荐用于辣椒植株上的黑僵菌防治。因此,降低了使用杀线虫剂的成本和副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信