Editorial Overview

Lori L. Scarlatos
{"title":"Editorial Overview","authors":"Lori L. Scarlatos","doi":"10.1177/00472395221139905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From chalk boards to smart boards, and from textbooks to eBooks, technology has always been integral to education. Yet until recently, it was assumed that if a technology was good in one educational context, then it would be good for all. Today we are coming to realize that context is important when designing educational technology systems. For example, technologies that enhance learning in higher education will not necessarily be appropriate for children in elementary school. Likewise, technologies that help students to understand history may not translate well to learning mathematics. This is the theme of the current issue of JETS: different technologies for different contexts. Our issue begins with the middle school context. The first paper focuses on problem-based learning in middle school science. The authors have implemented and tested various versions of a system for helping students with scaffolded learning using the ACT-R theoretical framework. Their description of the system is complete and easy to follow, and could readily be replicated in other schools. The second paper examines the impact of virtual reality, both immersive and nonimmersive, on 9th-grade social studies classes. The novel study described in this paper offers important insights that are likely to make teachers of social studies, both in and out of the classroom (including museums), want to try virtual reality. In the third paper, the authors describe how 3D printing has been used to increase engagement and understanding in middle school math classes. A side benefit is apparently that the teachers who participated in the program were afterwards more eager to experiment with other new technologies in the classroom. With the fourth paper we shift our focus to higher education. This paper examines the impact of moving college classes online during the pandemic, specifically on undergraduate STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) recitation courses at a research university. The authors note which aspects of these courses were retained, and what else was either added or lost. They also claim that, as might be expected, some of the changes will persist even as we migrate back to the classroom. Changes due to the pandemic are also the subject of the next paper. Specifically, the paper focuses on ICT (information and communications technology) competencies that are developed when a college math class is delivered in a blended manner. Although the paper is about a teaching experience at an African university, the lessons learned are important for any university in the developing world. Editorial","PeriodicalId":300288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221139905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From chalk boards to smart boards, and from textbooks to eBooks, technology has always been integral to education. Yet until recently, it was assumed that if a technology was good in one educational context, then it would be good for all. Today we are coming to realize that context is important when designing educational technology systems. For example, technologies that enhance learning in higher education will not necessarily be appropriate for children in elementary school. Likewise, technologies that help students to understand history may not translate well to learning mathematics. This is the theme of the current issue of JETS: different technologies for different contexts. Our issue begins with the middle school context. The first paper focuses on problem-based learning in middle school science. The authors have implemented and tested various versions of a system for helping students with scaffolded learning using the ACT-R theoretical framework. Their description of the system is complete and easy to follow, and could readily be replicated in other schools. The second paper examines the impact of virtual reality, both immersive and nonimmersive, on 9th-grade social studies classes. The novel study described in this paper offers important insights that are likely to make teachers of social studies, both in and out of the classroom (including museums), want to try virtual reality. In the third paper, the authors describe how 3D printing has been used to increase engagement and understanding in middle school math classes. A side benefit is apparently that the teachers who participated in the program were afterwards more eager to experiment with other new technologies in the classroom. With the fourth paper we shift our focus to higher education. This paper examines the impact of moving college classes online during the pandemic, specifically on undergraduate STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) recitation courses at a research university. The authors note which aspects of these courses were retained, and what else was either added or lost. They also claim that, as might be expected, some of the changes will persist even as we migrate back to the classroom. Changes due to the pandemic are also the subject of the next paper. Specifically, the paper focuses on ICT (information and communications technology) competencies that are developed when a college math class is delivered in a blended manner. Although the paper is about a teaching experience at an African university, the lessons learned are important for any university in the developing world. Editorial
编辑概述
从粉笔板到智能板,从教科书到电子书,科技一直是教育不可或缺的一部分。然而,直到最近,人们还认为,如果一项技术适用于一种教育环境,那么它将适用于所有教育环境。今天,我们开始意识到,在设计教育技术系统时,环境是很重要的。例如,促进高等教育学习的技术不一定适用于小学生。同样,帮助学生理解历史的技术可能无法很好地转化为数学的学习。这就是本期JETS的主题:不同的技术适用于不同的环境。我们的问题从中学的背景开始。第一篇论文的重点是中学科学中基于问题的学习。作者已经实施并测试了一个系统的不同版本,以帮助学生使用ACT-R理论框架进行脚手架式学习。他们对系统的描述是完整的,易于遵循,并且可以很容易地复制到其他学校。第二篇论文考察了虚拟现实对九年级社会研究课程的影响,包括沉浸式和非沉浸式。本文中描述的新颖研究提供了重要的见解,可能会使社会研究教师,无论是在课堂内还是在课堂外(包括博物馆),都想尝试虚拟现实。在第三篇论文中,作者描述了如何使用3D打印来提高中学数学课的参与度和理解力。一个附带的好处显然是,参与该项目的教师后来更渴望在课堂上试验其他新技术。在第四篇论文中,我们将重点转向高等教育。本文研究了在疫情期间将大学课程转移到网上的影响,特别是对研究型大学本科STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)背诵课程的影响。作者注意到这些课程的哪些方面被保留了下来,还有哪些方面被添加或丢失了。他们还声称,正如预期的那样,即使我们回到教室,一些变化也会持续存在。大流行造成的变化也是下一篇论文的主题。具体而言,本文侧重于以混合方式提供大学数学课时所开发的ICT(信息和通信技术)能力。尽管这篇论文是关于在一所非洲大学的教学经历,但从中学到的经验教训对发展中国家的任何一所大学都很重要。编辑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信