Subsea Gas Well Late Life Restart Lesson Learned: Failure Analysis and Operating Strategy

Song Wang, L. Lau, Wu Jun Tong, Kun An, Jiang Nan Duan, Xing Wang
{"title":"Subsea Gas Well Late Life Restart Lesson Learned: Failure Analysis and Operating Strategy","authors":"Song Wang, L. Lau, Wu Jun Tong, Kun An, Jiang Nan Duan, Xing Wang","doi":"10.2118/208620-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper elucidates the importance of flow assurance transient multiphase modelling to ensure uninterrupted late life productions. This is discussed in details through the case study of shut-in and restart scenarios of a subsea gas well (namely Well A) located in South China Sea region. There were two wells (Well A and Well B) producing steadily prior to asset shut-in, as a requirement for subsea pipeline maintenance works. However, it was found that Well A failed to restart while Well B successfully resumed production after the pipeline maintenance works. Flow assurance team is called in order to understand the root cause of the failed re-start of Well A to avoid similar failure for Well B and other wells in this region.\n Through failure analysis of Well A, key root cause is identified and associated operating strategy is proposed for use for Well B, which is producing through the same subsea infrastructure. Transient multiphase flow assurance model including subsea Well A, subsea Well B, associated spools, subsea pipeline and subsea riser is developed and fully benchmarked against field data to ensure realistic thermohydraulics representations of the actual asset. Simulation result shows failed restart of Well A and successful restart of Well B, which fully matched with field observations.\n Further analysis reveals that liquid column accumulated within the wellbore of Well A associates with extra hydrostatic head which caused failed well restart. Through a series of sensitivity analysis, the possibility of successful Well A restart is investigated by manipulating topsides back pressure settings and production flowrates prior to shut-in. These serve as a methodology to systematically analyze such transient scenario and to provide basis for field operating strategy.\n The analysis and strategy proposed through detailed modelling and simulation serves as valuable guidance for Well B, should shut-in and restart operation is required. This study shows the importance of modelling prior to late life field operations, in order to avoid similar failed well restart, which causes significant production and financial impacts.","PeriodicalId":335246,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, November 30, 2021","volume":"35 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, November 30, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208620-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper elucidates the importance of flow assurance transient multiphase modelling to ensure uninterrupted late life productions. This is discussed in details through the case study of shut-in and restart scenarios of a subsea gas well (namely Well A) located in South China Sea region. There were two wells (Well A and Well B) producing steadily prior to asset shut-in, as a requirement for subsea pipeline maintenance works. However, it was found that Well A failed to restart while Well B successfully resumed production after the pipeline maintenance works. Flow assurance team is called in order to understand the root cause of the failed re-start of Well A to avoid similar failure for Well B and other wells in this region. Through failure analysis of Well A, key root cause is identified and associated operating strategy is proposed for use for Well B, which is producing through the same subsea infrastructure. Transient multiphase flow assurance model including subsea Well A, subsea Well B, associated spools, subsea pipeline and subsea riser is developed and fully benchmarked against field data to ensure realistic thermohydraulics representations of the actual asset. Simulation result shows failed restart of Well A and successful restart of Well B, which fully matched with field observations. Further analysis reveals that liquid column accumulated within the wellbore of Well A associates with extra hydrostatic head which caused failed well restart. Through a series of sensitivity analysis, the possibility of successful Well A restart is investigated by manipulating topsides back pressure settings and production flowrates prior to shut-in. These serve as a methodology to systematically analyze such transient scenario and to provide basis for field operating strategy. The analysis and strategy proposed through detailed modelling and simulation serves as valuable guidance for Well B, should shut-in and restart operation is required. This study shows the importance of modelling prior to late life field operations, in order to avoid similar failed well restart, which causes significant production and financial impacts.
海底气井后期重启经验教训:故障分析和操作策略
本文阐述了流动保障瞬态多相建模对保证后期生产不间断的重要性。本文通过对位于南海地区的海底气井(即a井)的关井和重启方案的案例研究,详细讨论了这一问题。由于海底管道维护工作的需要,在资产关井之前,有两口井(井A和井B)稳定生产。然而,发现A井未能重新启动,而B井在管道维修后成功恢复生产。为了了解A井重新启动失败的根本原因,以避免B井和该地区的其他井出现类似的失败,流动保证小组被召集起来。通过对A井的故障分析,确定了关键的根本原因,并提出了相关的操作策略,适用于通过相同海底基础设施进行生产的B井。开发了瞬态多相流保证模型,包括海底A井、海底B井、相关的阀杆、海底管道和海底立管,并根据现场数据进行了全面基准测试,以确保实际资产的真实热力学表征。模拟结果显示,A井重启失败,B井重启成功,与现场观测结果完全吻合。进一步分析表明,A井井筒内积液柱与额外的静液水头有关,导致井重启失败。通过一系列敏感性分析,通过在关井前控制上部背压设置和生产流量,研究了a井成功重启的可能性。这些方法可以系统地分析这种暂态情况,并为现场作业战略提供依据。通过详细的建模和模拟提出的分析和策略可以为B井的关井和重新启动提供有价值的指导。该研究表明,在油田后期作业之前建立模型的重要性,可以避免类似的油井重启失败,从而对生产和财务造成重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信