Are Consumption Tariffs Still Up-to-Date? an Operationalized Assessment of Grid Fees

Julian Huber, Bent Richter, Christof Weinhardt
{"title":"Are Consumption Tariffs Still Up-to-Date? an Operationalized Assessment of Grid Fees","authors":"Julian Huber, Bent Richter, Christof Weinhardt","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2018.8469847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many European countries, electricity-related charges, distribution grid tariffs and taxes for small consumers depend on the amount of energy they draw from the grid. Often, grid tariffs in regulated markets do not yet provide incentives for grid-compatible behavior e.g., load capping or a temporal shifting of loads. When designing new grid fee tariffs, regulators must consider a wide range of criteria: Economic incentives must be in line with grid operation and expansion. Further, practical aspects in terms of complexity, transaction costs and enforceability must be considered. In addition, ethical requirements must be met, since basic services must be provided for all participants. Most research evaluates new grid fee tariffs only regarding isolated aspects. Additionally, these aspects are usually only analyzed qualitatively. Our paper provides a comprehensive overview of the criteria for assessing grid tariffs in various aspects derived from literature. We propose measurable constructs to quantify three assessment criteria. These criteria are embedded in a framework to make grid tariffs comparable for a given population of grid users. The applicability of the framework is demonstrated for a stylized population of grid participants in four scenarios. The aim is to provide political decision-makers with a comprehensible basis for the evaluation and development of new tariffs for grid fees. We find that adding a demand component makes tariffs more cost reflective in all scenarios and leads to a smaller average bill change at the current shares of domestic PV and BEV usage compared to consumption based fees.","PeriodicalId":334674,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"PC-20 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In many European countries, electricity-related charges, distribution grid tariffs and taxes for small consumers depend on the amount of energy they draw from the grid. Often, grid tariffs in regulated markets do not yet provide incentives for grid-compatible behavior e.g., load capping or a temporal shifting of loads. When designing new grid fee tariffs, regulators must consider a wide range of criteria: Economic incentives must be in line with grid operation and expansion. Further, practical aspects in terms of complexity, transaction costs and enforceability must be considered. In addition, ethical requirements must be met, since basic services must be provided for all participants. Most research evaluates new grid fee tariffs only regarding isolated aspects. Additionally, these aspects are usually only analyzed qualitatively. Our paper provides a comprehensive overview of the criteria for assessing grid tariffs in various aspects derived from literature. We propose measurable constructs to quantify three assessment criteria. These criteria are embedded in a framework to make grid tariffs comparable for a given population of grid users. The applicability of the framework is demonstrated for a stylized population of grid participants in four scenarios. The aim is to provide political decision-makers with a comprehensible basis for the evaluation and development of new tariffs for grid fees. We find that adding a demand component makes tariffs more cost reflective in all scenarios and leads to a smaller average bill change at the current shares of domestic PV and BEV usage compared to consumption based fees.
消费关税仍然是最新的吗?电网费用的可操作评估
在许多欧洲国家,与电力有关的费用、配电网的关税和小型消费者的税收取决于他们从电网获取的电量。通常,在受监管的市场中,电网关税还没有为电网兼容行为提供激励,例如负荷上限或负荷的临时转移。在设计新的电网收费标准时,监管机构必须考虑广泛的标准:经济激励必须与电网的运行和扩张相一致。此外,必须考虑复杂性、交易成本和可执行性方面的实际问题。此外,必须满足道德要求,因为必须向所有参与者提供基本服务。大多数研究仅从孤立的方面评估新的电网收费标准。此外,这些方面通常只进行定性分析。我们的论文提供了一个全面的概述标准,评估电网关税的各个方面,源自文献。我们提出了可测量的结构来量化三个评估标准。这些标准被嵌入到一个框架中,使电网电价对给定的电网用户群体具有可比性。在四种场景中演示了该框架对网格参与者的风格化人群的适用性。其目的是为政治决策者提供一个可理解的基础,以评估和制定新的电网收费标准。我们发现,增加需求组件使关税在所有情况下都更能反映成本,并且与基于消费的费用相比,在国内光伏和纯电动汽车使用的当前份额下,导致平均账单变化较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信