Deriving heuristics from political speeches for understanding statistics about society

J. Ridgway, Phoebe Arnold, W. Moy, Rosie Ridgway
{"title":"Deriving heuristics from political speeches for understanding statistics about society","authors":"J. Ridgway, Phoebe Arnold, W. Moy, Rosie Ridgway","doi":"10.52041/srap.16208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many governments adopt the mantra of ‘evidence informed policy’ and use ‘evidence’ to justify political decisions. Active citizenship requires an understanding of appropriate and inappropriate uses of statistics about society. A number of groups are dedicated to checking the claims made by politicians, and produce commentaries based on careful analyses of data sources and interpretations. Here, we use the commentaries of one such group (Full Fact) as a source of insight into some misleading statements made by politicians. These lead directly to heuristics that can be employed when faced with evidence claims. Further, the examples provide a basis for a framework for conceptualizing ‘statistical literacy’ in a data rich world.","PeriodicalId":165958,"journal":{"name":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","volume":"473 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.16208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Many governments adopt the mantra of ‘evidence informed policy’ and use ‘evidence’ to justify political decisions. Active citizenship requires an understanding of appropriate and inappropriate uses of statistics about society. A number of groups are dedicated to checking the claims made by politicians, and produce commentaries based on careful analyses of data sources and interpretations. Here, we use the commentaries of one such group (Full Fact) as a source of insight into some misleading statements made by politicians. These lead directly to heuristics that can be employed when faced with evidence claims. Further, the examples provide a basis for a framework for conceptualizing ‘statistical literacy’ in a data rich world.
从政治演讲中获得启发,以理解社会统计
许多政府奉行“循证政策”的口号,并利用“证据”为政治决策辩护。积极的公民意识要求理解对社会统计数据的适当和不适当使用。许多组织致力于检查政客的言论,并根据对数据来源和解释的仔细分析发表评论。在这里,我们使用一个这样的团体(Full Fact)的评论作为洞察政客们一些误导性言论的来源。这些直接导致了在面对证据要求时可以使用的启发式。此外,这些例子为在数据丰富的世界中概念化“统计素养”的框架提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信