Migration Crises as Challenges to EU Security: History of Development and Current Condition

D. Boichuk, Darya Hroza
{"title":"Migration Crises as Challenges to EU Security: History of Development and Current Condition","authors":"D. Boichuk, Darya Hroza","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. In countries with democratic regimes at the constitutional level (and Ukraine is no exception), a person, his life and health, honor and dignity, inviolability and security are recognized as the highest social value (including in Ukraine), because it forms the physical and intellectual potential of the country, ensures the existence of the system of state bodies through the taxation system, and the competitiveness of the nation in the international arena. In such regimes, the people themselves, as a collection of individuals, are recognized as the source of political power. Statements similar in content are also reflected in the Founding Treaties of the European Union, which enshrine the key goals and values of the EU, the basic principles of the European Union. Thus, Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union defines the basic values of the EU as human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, human rights, in particular of persons belonging to minorities. In addition, there is no objection to the fact that the European Union (beginning with its history from the time of the Communities) has today developed to the level of a unique integration association that has a large number of attractive characteristics for migration, primarily of an organizational and economic nature (4 freedom of movement within the EU, a single customs area, a common border, etc.). Therefore, the issue of demographic security is one of the main goals of regulating the migration policy of the EU member states to ensure the stable development of the countries. Otherwise, demographic problems can easily destabilize the normal functioning of the state in various spheres of its life (economic, political, cultural, religious, social). The subject matter of our research acquires special importance considering the fact that migration policy is assigned to the exclusive competence of the EU, not the member states. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The study of such a phenomenon as migration, its factors and consequences, historical analysis, assessment of its positive and negative sides are devoted to the work of such scientists as M. Weiner, B. Yuskiv, O. Oleksiv, R. Rachynskyi, O. Zastavna. Target of the research is to investigate the causes and consequences of migration flows, their historical origins, to analyze the migration crisis of 2015-2016 in the European Union, to consider the draft Pact on Migration and Asylum, which is intended to be a significant step towards the creation of a reliable and effective migration management system. Article’s main body. The main factors of migration flows are established: “classical (natural) factors” and those caused by “governmental-determined” governments. The historical and legal development of EU visa policy is analyzed. Normative legal acts regulating the sphere of legal status of refugees, citizens of third countries who are long-term residents, migrants and asylum seekers have been studied. The evaluation of the EU migration policy is given and its significant shortcomings are emphasized, namely its inefficiency, high cost and short-sightedness. The EU “migration crisis” of 2015-2016, the unbalanced distribution of migrants between EU member states, which is a violation of the quota-based refugee admission plan, is considered. The positive and negative sides of migration, which influence the internal policy of the member states, are weighed. An analysis of the new EU Migration and Asylum Pact, which opens up the possibility for more effective migration management in Europe, based on commitment to human rights and respect for the dignity of migrants, setting rules on how member states can show solidarity. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The authors claim that the policy of multiculturalism of the EU was effective precisely in the relatively calm second half of the 20th century, and before the beginning of armed conflicts in the East (Iraq, Syria, etc.) in the 21st century. In article proposed approaches to solving migration crisis issues, its occurrence, typification and ways to overcome it. The new Pact on Migration and Asylum was given a positive assessment and its principles were defined.","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"33 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2023-1(41)-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem setting. In countries with democratic regimes at the constitutional level (and Ukraine is no exception), a person, his life and health, honor and dignity, inviolability and security are recognized as the highest social value (including in Ukraine), because it forms the physical and intellectual potential of the country, ensures the existence of the system of state bodies through the taxation system, and the competitiveness of the nation in the international arena. In such regimes, the people themselves, as a collection of individuals, are recognized as the source of political power. Statements similar in content are also reflected in the Founding Treaties of the European Union, which enshrine the key goals and values of the EU, the basic principles of the European Union. Thus, Article 2 of the Treaty on the European Union defines the basic values of the EU as human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, human rights, in particular of persons belonging to minorities. In addition, there is no objection to the fact that the European Union (beginning with its history from the time of the Communities) has today developed to the level of a unique integration association that has a large number of attractive characteristics for migration, primarily of an organizational and economic nature (4 freedom of movement within the EU, a single customs area, a common border, etc.). Therefore, the issue of demographic security is one of the main goals of regulating the migration policy of the EU member states to ensure the stable development of the countries. Otherwise, demographic problems can easily destabilize the normal functioning of the state in various spheres of its life (economic, political, cultural, religious, social). The subject matter of our research acquires special importance considering the fact that migration policy is assigned to the exclusive competence of the EU, not the member states. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The study of such a phenomenon as migration, its factors and consequences, historical analysis, assessment of its positive and negative sides are devoted to the work of such scientists as M. Weiner, B. Yuskiv, O. Oleksiv, R. Rachynskyi, O. Zastavna. Target of the research is to investigate the causes and consequences of migration flows, their historical origins, to analyze the migration crisis of 2015-2016 in the European Union, to consider the draft Pact on Migration and Asylum, which is intended to be a significant step towards the creation of a reliable and effective migration management system. Article’s main body. The main factors of migration flows are established: “classical (natural) factors” and those caused by “governmental-determined” governments. The historical and legal development of EU visa policy is analyzed. Normative legal acts regulating the sphere of legal status of refugees, citizens of third countries who are long-term residents, migrants and asylum seekers have been studied. The evaluation of the EU migration policy is given and its significant shortcomings are emphasized, namely its inefficiency, high cost and short-sightedness. The EU “migration crisis” of 2015-2016, the unbalanced distribution of migrants between EU member states, which is a violation of the quota-based refugee admission plan, is considered. The positive and negative sides of migration, which influence the internal policy of the member states, are weighed. An analysis of the new EU Migration and Asylum Pact, which opens up the possibility for more effective migration management in Europe, based on commitment to human rights and respect for the dignity of migrants, setting rules on how member states can show solidarity. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The authors claim that the policy of multiculturalism of the EU was effective precisely in the relatively calm second half of the 20th century, and before the beginning of armed conflicts in the East (Iraq, Syria, etc.) in the 21st century. In article proposed approaches to solving migration crisis issues, its occurrence, typification and ways to overcome it. The new Pact on Migration and Asylum was given a positive assessment and its principles were defined.
移民危机对欧盟安全的挑战:发展历史和现状
问题设置。在宪法层面实行民主制度的国家(乌克兰也不例外),一个人,他的生命和健康,荣誉和尊严,不可侵犯性和安全性被认为是最高的社会价值(包括在乌克兰),因为它构成了国家的体力和智力潜力,通过税收制度确保国家机构系统的存在,以及国家在国际舞台上的竞争力。在这样的政权中,人民本身,作为个人的集合,被认为是政治权力的来源。类似内容的声明也反映在欧盟的创始条约中,这些条约体现了欧盟的主要目标和价值观,即欧盟的基本原则。因此,《欧洲联盟条约》第2条将欧盟的基本价值定义为人的尊严、自由、民主、平等、法治、人权,特别是属于少数群体的人的人权。此外,没有人反对这样一个事实,即欧盟(从共同体时期的历史开始)今天已经发展到一个独特的一体化协会的水平,该协会具有大量吸引移民的特征,主要是组织和经济性质(欧盟内部的行动自由,单一关税区,共同边界等)。因此,人口安全问题是欧盟成员国调控移民政策以确保国家稳定发展的主要目标之一。否则,人口问题很容易破坏国家在其生活各个领域(经济、政治、文化、宗教、社会)的正常运作。考虑到移民政策是欧盟的专属权限,而不是成员国的专属权限,我们研究的主题就显得尤为重要。分析最近的研究和出版物。像M. Weiner、B. Yuskiv、O. Oleksiv、R. Rachynskyi、O. Zastavna这样的科学家对移民现象、其因素和后果、历史分析、积极和消极方面的评估进行了研究。研究的目标是调查移民流动的原因和后果,他们的历史起源,分析2015-2016年欧盟的移民危机,考虑移民和庇护公约草案,这是朝着建立一个可靠和有效的移民管理系统迈出的重要一步。文章的主体。确立了移民流动的主要因素:“经典(自然)因素”和“政府决定”政府造成的因素。分析了欧盟签证政策的历史和法律发展。对规范难民、第三国长期居民公民、移徙者和寻求庇护者法律地位领域的规范性法律行为进行了研究。本文对欧盟移民政策进行了评价,并强调了欧盟移民政策存在的低效、高成本和短视等重大缺陷。考虑到2015-2016年欧盟“移民危机”,欧盟成员国之间的移民分配不平衡,这违反了以配额为基础的难民接纳计划。对影响成员国内部政策的移民的积极和消极方面进行了权衡。新的《欧盟移民与庇护协定》(EU Migration and Asylum Pact)基于对人权的承诺和对移民尊严的尊重,为欧洲更有效的移民管理开辟了可能性,并为成员国如何展示团结制定了规则。结论及发展展望。作者声称,欧盟的多元文化主义政策恰恰是在相对平静的20世纪下半叶和21世纪东方(伊拉克、叙利亚等)武装冲突开始之前有效的。本文提出了解决移民危机问题的途径,移民危机的发生、类型和克服途径。新的《移徙和庇护公约》得到了积极评价,并确定了其原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信