Improving the Recommendation of Collaborative Filtering by Fusing Trust Network

Bo Yang, Pengfei Zhao, Shuqiu Ping, Jing Huang
{"title":"Improving the Recommendation of Collaborative Filtering by Fusing Trust Network","authors":"Bo Yang, Pengfei Zhao, Shuqiu Ping, Jing Huang","doi":"10.1109/CIS.2012.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To accurately and actively provide users with their potentially interested information or services is the main task of a recommender system. Collaborative filtering is one of the most widely adopted recommender methods, whereas it is suffering the issue of sparse rating data that will severely degenerate the quality of recommendations. To address this issue, the article proposes a novel method, named the FTRA (Fusing Trust and Ratings), trying to improve the performance of collaborative filtering recommendation by means of elaborately integrating twofold sparse information, i.e., the conventional rating data given by users and the social trust network among the same users. The performance of FTRA is rigorously validated by comparing it with six representative methods on a real-world dataset. The experimental results show that the FTRA outperforms all other competitors in terms of both precision and recall. More importantly, our work suggests that the strategy of augmenting sparse rating data by fusing trust networks does significantly improve the quality of conventional collaborative filtering recommendation, and its quality could be further improved by means of designing more effective integrating schemes.","PeriodicalId":294394,"journal":{"name":"2012 Eighth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security","volume":"2 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Eighth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS.2012.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

To accurately and actively provide users with their potentially interested information or services is the main task of a recommender system. Collaborative filtering is one of the most widely adopted recommender methods, whereas it is suffering the issue of sparse rating data that will severely degenerate the quality of recommendations. To address this issue, the article proposes a novel method, named the FTRA (Fusing Trust and Ratings), trying to improve the performance of collaborative filtering recommendation by means of elaborately integrating twofold sparse information, i.e., the conventional rating data given by users and the social trust network among the same users. The performance of FTRA is rigorously validated by comparing it with six representative methods on a real-world dataset. The experimental results show that the FTRA outperforms all other competitors in terms of both precision and recall. More importantly, our work suggests that the strategy of augmenting sparse rating data by fusing trust networks does significantly improve the quality of conventional collaborative filtering recommendation, and its quality could be further improved by means of designing more effective integrating schemes.
融合信任网络改进协同过滤推荐
准确、主动地向用户提供他们可能感兴趣的信息或服务是推荐系统的主要任务。协同过滤是目前应用最广泛的推荐方法之一,但它面临着评级数据稀疏的问题,这将严重降低推荐的质量。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种名为FTRA (fusion Trust and Ratings)的新方法,试图通过精心整合用户给出的传统评分数据和同一用户之间的社会信任网络的双重稀疏信息来提高协同过滤推荐的性能。通过与实际数据集上的六种代表性方法进行比较,严格验证了FTRA的性能。实验结果表明,FTRA在准确率和召回率方面都优于其他竞争对手。更重要的是,我们的工作表明,通过融合信任网络增强稀疏评级数据的策略确实显著提高了传统协同过滤推荐的质量,并且可以通过设计更有效的集成方案进一步提高其质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信