Exploring Siri’s Content Diversity Using a Crowdsourced Audit

Tim Glaesener
{"title":"Exploring Siri’s Content Diversity Using a Crowdsourced Audit","authors":"Tim Glaesener","doi":"10.33621/jdsr.v4i1.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nThis study aims to describe the content diversity of Siri’s search results in the polarized context of US politics. To do so, a crowdsourced audit was conducted. A diverse sample of 170 US-based Siri users between the ages of 18-64 performed five identical queries about politically controversial issues. The data were analyzed using the concept of algorithmic bias. The results suggest that Siri’s search algorithm produces a long tail distribution of search results: Forty-two percent of the participants received the six most frequent answers, while 22% of the users received unique answers. These statistics indicate that Siri’s search algorithm causes moderate concentration and low fragmentation. The age and, surprisingly, the political orientation of users, do not seem to be driving either concentration or fragmentation. However, the users' gender and location appear to cause low concentration.\n\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":199704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Social Research","volume":"68 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33621/jdsr.v4i1.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe the content diversity of Siri’s search results in the polarized context of US politics. To do so, a crowdsourced audit was conducted. A diverse sample of 170 US-based Siri users between the ages of 18-64 performed five identical queries about politically controversial issues. The data were analyzed using the concept of algorithmic bias. The results suggest that Siri’s search algorithm produces a long tail distribution of search results: Forty-two percent of the participants received the six most frequent answers, while 22% of the users received unique answers. These statistics indicate that Siri’s search algorithm causes moderate concentration and low fragmentation. The age and, surprisingly, the political orientation of users, do not seem to be driving either concentration or fragmentation. However, the users' gender and location appear to cause low concentration.
使用众包审计探索Siri的内容多样性
本研究旨在描述在美国政治两极分化的背景下Siri搜索结果的内容多样性。为此,进行了众包审计。170名年龄在18岁至64岁之间的美国Siri用户进行了一项抽样调查,他们就政治争议问题提出了5个相同的问题。使用算法偏差的概念分析数据。结果表明,Siri的搜索算法产生了搜索结果的长尾分布:42%的参与者收到了六个最常见的答案,而22%的用户收到了唯一的答案。这些统计数据表明,Siri的搜索算法导致了适度的集中和低碎片化。令人惊讶的是,用户的年龄和政治倾向似乎既没有推动集中,也没有推动分散。然而,用户的性别和位置似乎导致了低浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信