{"title":"Feasibility of “perfect” function evaluation","authors":"C. Dunham","doi":"10.1145/122272.122276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper casts doubt on the feasibility of perfect subroutines or perfect hardware for mathematical functions, in particular by conversion from double precision. It suggests a slightly relaxed standard.","PeriodicalId":177516,"journal":{"name":"ACM Signum Newsletter","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Signum Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/122272.122276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
This paper casts doubt on the feasibility of perfect subroutines or perfect hardware for mathematical functions, in particular by conversion from double precision. It suggests a slightly relaxed standard.