An assertional correctness proof of a self-stabilizing /spl lscr/-exclusion algorithm

M. Besta, F. Stomp
{"title":"An assertional correctness proof of a self-stabilizing /spl lscr/-exclusion algorithm","authors":"M. Besta, F. Stomp","doi":"10.1109/ICECCS.2006.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A formal correctness proof of a self-stabilizing lscr-exclusion algorithm (SLEX) is described. The analyzed algorithm is an improvement of the SLEX due to Abraham, Dolev, Herman, and Koll, since our version satisfies a stronger liveness property. The proof is formulated in linear-time temporal logic and utilizes a history variable to model access to regular registers. The proof consists of a safety part and a liveness part. Our analysis provides some new insight in the correctness of the algorithm: (1) our proof is constructive. That is, we explicitly formulate auxiliary quantities required to establish some of the properties. This contrasts with the operational arguments of Abraham et al., where many quantities are not explicitly formulated and the validity of the above mentioned properties are established by disproving their non-existence. (2) We characterize processes (and their minimum number) identified by some process as attempting to enter the critical section. (3) A novel proof rule for reasoning about programs in the presence of disabled processes is presented to structure the liveness proof","PeriodicalId":269321,"journal":{"name":"11th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS'06)","volume":"147 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS.2006.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A formal correctness proof of a self-stabilizing lscr-exclusion algorithm (SLEX) is described. The analyzed algorithm is an improvement of the SLEX due to Abraham, Dolev, Herman, and Koll, since our version satisfies a stronger liveness property. The proof is formulated in linear-time temporal logic and utilizes a history variable to model access to regular registers. The proof consists of a safety part and a liveness part. Our analysis provides some new insight in the correctness of the algorithm: (1) our proof is constructive. That is, we explicitly formulate auxiliary quantities required to establish some of the properties. This contrasts with the operational arguments of Abraham et al., where many quantities are not explicitly formulated and the validity of the above mentioned properties are established by disproving their non-existence. (2) We characterize processes (and their minimum number) identified by some process as attempting to enter the critical section. (3) A novel proof rule for reasoning about programs in the presence of disabled processes is presented to structure the liveness proof
一种自稳定/spl lscr/-排除算法的断言正确性证明
给出了一种自稳定lscr-不相容算法(SLEX)的形式化正确性证明。所分析的算法是由于Abraham, Dolev, Herman和Koll对SLEX的改进,因为我们的版本满足更强的活性。该证明是在线性时间时间逻辑中制定的,并利用历史变量来模拟对常规寄存器的访问。证明由安全部分和活性部分组成。我们的分析对算法的正确性提供了一些新的见解:(1)我们的证明是建设性的。也就是说,我们明确地表述了建立某些性质所需的辅助量。这与亚伯拉罕等人的操作论证形成鲜明对比,其中许多数量没有明确表述,上述性质的有效性是通过反驳它们的不存在来建立的。(2)我们描述被某些进程识别为试图进入临界区域的进程(及其最小数量)。(3)提出了一种新的证明规则,用于在进程失效的情况下对程序进行推理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信