Isaiah Berlin, Negative Liberty, and Neoliberalism

M. Harris
{"title":"Isaiah Berlin, Negative Liberty, and Neoliberalism","authors":"M. Harris","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3248569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay suggests that the events of the 1980s require us to update Berlin’s claim that “the ‘positive’ conception of freedom… has in fact, and as a matter of history, of doctrine and of practice, lent itself more easily” to political manipulation. These events prompt us not only to review Berlin’s empirical-historical observation; they also call on us to take seriously Berlin’s passing comment that the political perversion of positive liberty “can no doubt be perpetrated just as easily with the ‘negative’ concept of freedom”. In Part II of this essay, I take forward Berlin’s suggestion that negative liberty may be just as liable to be perverted as positive liberty. I close in Part III by proposing future lines of inquiry, and sketching the implications of the argument for the history of neoliberalism and the future of positive liberty.","PeriodicalId":258423,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)","volume":"21 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3248569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay suggests that the events of the 1980s require us to update Berlin’s claim that “the ‘positive’ conception of freedom… has in fact, and as a matter of history, of doctrine and of practice, lent itself more easily” to political manipulation. These events prompt us not only to review Berlin’s empirical-historical observation; they also call on us to take seriously Berlin’s passing comment that the political perversion of positive liberty “can no doubt be perpetrated just as easily with the ‘negative’ concept of freedom”. In Part II of this essay, I take forward Berlin’s suggestion that negative liberty may be just as liable to be perverted as positive liberty. I close in Part III by proposing future lines of inquiry, and sketching the implications of the argument for the history of neoliberalism and the future of positive liberty.
以赛亚·伯林,消极自由与新自由主义
这篇文章表明,20世纪80年代的事件要求我们更新柏林的主张,即“自由的‘积极’概念……事实上,从历史、理论和实践的角度来看,更容易”被政治操纵。这些事件促使我们不仅要回顾柏林的经验主义历史观察;他们还呼吁我们认真对待柏林的随口评论,即对积极自由的政治曲解“无疑可以像‘消极’自由概念一样轻易地犯下”。在本文的第二部分,我提出了柏林的建议,即消极自由可能与积极自由一样容易被歪曲。在第三部分中,我提出了未来的研究方向,并概述了新自由主义历史和积极自由的未来的争论的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信