Evaluation and Analysis of Comprehensive Influence of Papers: Multidisciplinary as an Example

Yangyang Jiang, Bo-Ra Jin
{"title":"Evaluation and Analysis of Comprehensive Influence of Papers: Multidisciplinary as an Example","authors":"Yangyang Jiang, Bo-Ra Jin","doi":"10.1109/DDCLS49620.2020.9275263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By introducing supplementary evaluation indexes, this paper makes up for the deficiencies of lag, injustice, discipline bias, and one-sidedness of traditional citation evaluation. Multidisciplinary papers are selected as the data source. Correlation analysis, validity analysis, factor analysis, and principal component analysis are used to analyze the data of each index to construct a comprehensive influence evaluation model. The results show that the model is a comprehensive evaluation model with academic evaluation as the main and social evaluation as the auxiliary. The comprehensive influence score of papers can be calculated through comprehensive influence formulas, to obtain a more comprehensive and reasonable evaluation result. This paper provides data support for the proportion of each index data in the comprehensive evaluation of academic papers, and also provides a reference for index selection and evaluation model optimization of comprehensive influence evaluation of papers.","PeriodicalId":420469,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 9th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 9th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DDCLS49620.2020.9275263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

By introducing supplementary evaluation indexes, this paper makes up for the deficiencies of lag, injustice, discipline bias, and one-sidedness of traditional citation evaluation. Multidisciplinary papers are selected as the data source. Correlation analysis, validity analysis, factor analysis, and principal component analysis are used to analyze the data of each index to construct a comprehensive influence evaluation model. The results show that the model is a comprehensive evaluation model with academic evaluation as the main and social evaluation as the auxiliary. The comprehensive influence score of papers can be calculated through comprehensive influence formulas, to obtain a more comprehensive and reasonable evaluation result. This paper provides data support for the proportion of each index data in the comprehensive evaluation of academic papers, and also provides a reference for index selection and evaluation model optimization of comprehensive influence evaluation of papers.
论文综合影响力评价与分析:以多学科为例
通过引入补充评价指标,弥补了传统引文评价存在的滞后、不公正、学科偏倚、片面性等不足。选择多学科论文作为数据来源。采用相关分析、效度分析、因子分析、主成分分析等方法对各指标数据进行分析,构建综合影响评价模型。结果表明,该模型是一个以学术评价为主、社会评价为辅的综合评价模型。通过综合影响力公式计算论文的综合影响力得分,得到更全面合理的评价结果。本文为各指标数据在学术论文综合评价中的占比提供了数据支持,也为论文综合影响力评价的指标选择和评价模型优化提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信