Method for evaluation of different MRI segmentation approaches

Jun Yang, Sung-Cheng Huang
{"title":"Method for evaluation of different MRI segmentation approaches","authors":"Jun Yang, Sung-Cheng Huang","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.773937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common comparison indices for evaluating MRI segmentation are usually based on: percentage of volumetric measure of different tissue types; cross-correlation matrix between a segmentation result and the manual segmentation result. Since manual segmentation is not the true reference, the authors proposed a new evaluation method which simulated MR images. Extracted cross covariance inhomogeneity map from a real MRI data, together with a manual segmentation are used to generate MRI simulated images. The result showed that common evaluation method using manual segmentation as reference is subject to intra- and inter-rater variations and requires time consuming manual segmentation step for each study to evaluate, while the proposed method is expected to provide faster and more objective measure for comparing different MR segmentation methods.","PeriodicalId":129202,"journal":{"name":"1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255)","volume":"4 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.773937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Common comparison indices for evaluating MRI segmentation are usually based on: percentage of volumetric measure of different tissue types; cross-correlation matrix between a segmentation result and the manual segmentation result. Since manual segmentation is not the true reference, the authors proposed a new evaluation method which simulated MR images. Extracted cross covariance inhomogeneity map from a real MRI data, together with a manual segmentation are used to generate MRI simulated images. The result showed that common evaluation method using manual segmentation as reference is subject to intra- and inter-rater variations and requires time consuming manual segmentation step for each study to evaluate, while the proposed method is expected to provide faster and more objective measure for comparing different MR segmentation methods.
不同MRI分割方法的评价方法
评价MRI分割的常用比较指标通常基于:不同组织类型的体积测量百分比;分割结果与人工分割结果之间的相互关系矩阵。针对人工分割不是真实参考的问题,提出了一种模拟MR图像的评价方法。从真实MRI数据中提取交叉协方差非均匀性图,结合人工分割生成MRI模拟图像。结果表明,常用的以人工分割为参考的评价方法存在区域内和区域间的差异,且每个研究都需要耗时的人工分割步骤进行评价,而本文提出的方法有望为不同MR分割方法的比较提供更快、更客观的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信