Regulation TL;DR: Adversarial Text Summarization of Federal Register Articles

Filipo Sharevski, Peter Jachim, Emma Pieroni
{"title":"Regulation TL;DR: Adversarial Text Summarization of Federal Register Articles","authors":"Filipo Sharevski, Peter Jachim, Emma Pieroni","doi":"10.1145/3474374.3486917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Short on time with a reduced attention span, people disengage from reading long text with a \"too long, didn't read\" justification. While a useful heuristic of managing reading resources, we believe that \"tl;dr\" is prone to adversarial manipulation. In a seemingly noble effort to produce a bite-sized segments of information fitting social media posts, an adversity could reduce a long text to a short but polarizing summary. In this paper we demonstrate an adversarial text summarization that reduces Federal Register long texts to summaries with obvious liberal or conservative leanings. Contextualizing summaries to a political agenda is hardly new, but a barrage of polarizing \"tl;dr\" social media posts could derail the public debate about important public policy matters with an unprecedented lack of effort. We show and elaborate on such example \"tl;dr\" posts to showcase a new and relatively unexplored avenue for information operations on social media.","PeriodicalId":319965,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cyber-Security Arms Race","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Cyber-Security Arms Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3474374.3486917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short on time with a reduced attention span, people disengage from reading long text with a "too long, didn't read" justification. While a useful heuristic of managing reading resources, we believe that "tl;dr" is prone to adversarial manipulation. In a seemingly noble effort to produce a bite-sized segments of information fitting social media posts, an adversity could reduce a long text to a short but polarizing summary. In this paper we demonstrate an adversarial text summarization that reduces Federal Register long texts to summaries with obvious liberal or conservative leanings. Contextualizing summaries to a political agenda is hardly new, but a barrage of polarizing "tl;dr" social media posts could derail the public debate about important public policy matters with an unprecedented lack of effort. We show and elaborate on such example "tl;dr" posts to showcase a new and relatively unexplored avenue for information operations on social media.
法规TL;DR:联邦公报条款的对抗性文本摘要
由于时间短,注意力持续时间短,人们会以“太长,没读”为理由,从阅读长文本中脱离出来。虽然这是管理阅读资源的一个有用的启发式方法,但我们认为“tl;dr”容易被对抗性操纵。在一个看似高尚的努力中,产生适合社交媒体帖子的一小段信息,逆境可以将长文本缩短为简短但两极分化的摘要。在本文中,我们展示了一种对抗性文本摘要,它将联邦公报的长文本减少为具有明显自由或保守倾向的摘要。将摘要与政治议程联系起来并不是什么新鲜事,但社交媒体上大量两极分化的“tl;dr”帖子可能会以前所未有的缺乏努力的方式破坏公众对重要公共政策问题的辩论。我们展示并详细阐述了这样的例子“tl;dr”帖子,以展示社交媒体上信息操作的一种新的、相对未被探索的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书