Pakistan: Withholdingization of the Economic System - A Source of Revenue, Civil Strife, or Dutch Disease+?

M. A. Ahmed
{"title":"Pakistan: Withholdingization of the Economic System - A Source of Revenue, Civil Strife, or Dutch Disease+?","authors":"M. A. Ahmed","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3621413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper takes an incisive shot at the systemic inadequacies that have tiptoed into the economic order of the state over time via the apparently innocuous mechanism of withholding taxes. Withholding tax – a legitimate instrument of preponing the state revenues on clearly identifiable chunks of incomes – has historically been resorted to by most states, and to that extent it should be normal with Pakistan, too. However, what has happened in Pakistan is that the tool of withholding taxation has been used as a source of revenues way too large in scale, size, scope and intensity. In addition to the pulling forward of tax collection on clearly demarcated chunks of incomes, a large number of transactions have also been roped into its nexus and then charged to tax by presumptivizing gross receipts as income – a withholdingization of the sorts not only of the tax system but of the entire economic system as a weighty portion of ubiquitous withholding taxes gets stuck into the pricing structure of the final goods and services produced in the economy rendering them price-incompetitive in the international market. This overwhelming withholdingization of the economic system, it is argued, has been brought about by a numb state continually operating under, using a Freudian framework, the “pleasure principle” instead of the “reality principle” with political governments complacently choosing to continue harvesting quick bucks into the exchequer, pushing the extractive system into a total disarray, the society into burgeoning civil strife, and the economy to the Dutch Disease effect.","PeriodicalId":431495,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Taxation","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3621413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The paper takes an incisive shot at the systemic inadequacies that have tiptoed into the economic order of the state over time via the apparently innocuous mechanism of withholding taxes. Withholding tax – a legitimate instrument of preponing the state revenues on clearly identifiable chunks of incomes – has historically been resorted to by most states, and to that extent it should be normal with Pakistan, too. However, what has happened in Pakistan is that the tool of withholding taxation has been used as a source of revenues way too large in scale, size, scope and intensity. In addition to the pulling forward of tax collection on clearly demarcated chunks of incomes, a large number of transactions have also been roped into its nexus and then charged to tax by presumptivizing gross receipts as income – a withholdingization of the sorts not only of the tax system but of the entire economic system as a weighty portion of ubiquitous withholding taxes gets stuck into the pricing structure of the final goods and services produced in the economy rendering them price-incompetitive in the international market. This overwhelming withholdingization of the economic system, it is argued, has been brought about by a numb state continually operating under, using a Freudian framework, the “pleasure principle” instead of the “reality principle” with political governments complacently choosing to continue harvesting quick bucks into the exchequer, pushing the extractive system into a total disarray, the society into burgeoning civil strife, and the economy to the Dutch Disease effect.
巴基斯坦:经济体系的封闭——收入来源、内乱还是荷兰病?
随着时间的推移,通过看似无害的预扣税机制,系统性的缺陷已经悄悄进入了国家的经济秩序,这篇论文对这些缺陷进行了尖锐的抨击。预扣税——一种在明确可识别的大块收入上预支国家收入的合法工具——历来被大多数国家采用,从某种程度上说,这在巴基斯坦也应该是正常的。然而,在巴基斯坦发生的事情是,预扣税的工具被用作规模、规模、范围和强度太大的收入来源。除了推动对明确划分的大块收入征税外,大量的交易也被捆绑在它的关系中,然后通过假定收入总额作为收入来征税- -这种预扣税不仅适用于税收系统,而且适用于整个经济系统,因为无处不在的预扣税的很大一部分被卡在经济中生产的最终商品和服务的定价结构中,使它们在国际市场上缺乏价格竞争力。有人认为,这种对经济体系的压倒性抵制,是由一个麻木的国家带来的,使用弗洛伊德的框架,“快乐原则”而不是“现实原则”,政治政府自满地选择继续从国库中获取快钱,将采掘系统推向完全混乱,社会陷入迅速发展的内乱,经济陷入荷兰病效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信