Constructing ESG Equity Index Portfolios—The Impact of Exclusions on Risk and Return

Jan-Carl Plagge
{"title":"Constructing ESG Equity Index Portfolios—The Impact of Exclusions on Risk and Return","authors":"Jan-Carl Plagge","doi":"10.3905/jbis.2023.14.3.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a wide range of business involvement data, we construct and backtest rules-based ESG exclusion portfolios and assess the implications of individual exclusions as well as groups thereof on portfolio return, risk as well as factor exposures relative to the broad market. Across our sample covering companies from five equity markets (USA, Developed Europe, Japan, Developed Asia ex Japan as well as Emerging Markets) and 10 years ending in December 2022, we find the absolute of return and risk differences to be positively correlated with the portion of the underlying market that is excluded. For excess returns, this relationship largely disappears when moving from the absolute of to actual excess returns—indicating the absence of a uniform relationship between exclusions and return. Rather, the direction of the impact of exclusions on portfolio returns is found to be highly exclusion- as well as region dependent. An analysis of the drivers of return differences shows that the relevance and direction of style factor exposures is similarly exclusion- and region dependent. Once controlling for factors, we find alphas to be largely statistically insignificant. As a result of our findings, investors should pay special attention to the selection and specification of exclusions and whether these go hand in hand with systematic style factor tilts.","PeriodicalId":284314,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies","volume":"216 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jbis.2023.14.3.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a wide range of business involvement data, we construct and backtest rules-based ESG exclusion portfolios and assess the implications of individual exclusions as well as groups thereof on portfolio return, risk as well as factor exposures relative to the broad market. Across our sample covering companies from five equity markets (USA, Developed Europe, Japan, Developed Asia ex Japan as well as Emerging Markets) and 10 years ending in December 2022, we find the absolute of return and risk differences to be positively correlated with the portion of the underlying market that is excluded. For excess returns, this relationship largely disappears when moving from the absolute of to actual excess returns—indicating the absence of a uniform relationship between exclusions and return. Rather, the direction of the impact of exclusions on portfolio returns is found to be highly exclusion- as well as region dependent. An analysis of the drivers of return differences shows that the relevance and direction of style factor exposures is similarly exclusion- and region dependent. Once controlling for factors, we find alphas to be largely statistically insignificant. As a result of our findings, investors should pay special attention to the selection and specification of exclusions and whether these go hand in hand with systematic style factor tilts.
构建ESG股票指数投资组合——排除因素对风险和收益的影响
基于广泛的业务参与数据,我们构建并回溯测试了基于规则的ESG排除投资组合,并评估了个别排除及其组对投资组合回报、风险以及相对于整体市场的因素暴露的影响。我们的样本涵盖了来自五个股票市场(美国、欧洲发达国家、日本、亚洲发达国家(不包括日本)以及新兴市场)和截至2022年12月的10年的公司,我们发现回报和风险差异的绝对值与被排除在外的基础市场部分呈正相关。对于超额收益,当从绝对超额收益转移到实际超额收益时,这种关系在很大程度上消失了——这表明排除和收益之间缺乏统一的关系。相反,排除对投资组合回报的影响方向被发现是高度排除的——以及地区依赖的。对回报差异驱动因素的分析表明,风格因素暴露的相关性和方向同样依赖于排除和区域。一旦控制了因素,我们发现alpha在统计上基本上是不显著的。根据我们的研究结果,投资者应特别注意排除因素的选择和规范,以及这些因素是否与系统性风格因素倾斜密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信