ІЄРАРХІЯ НОРМАТИВНО-ПРАВОВИХ АКТІВ: СУЧАСНИЙ СТАН ТА АКТУАЛЬНІ ПИТАННЯ

Світлана Козуліна
{"title":"ІЄРАРХІЯ НОРМАТИВНО-ПРАВОВИХ АКТІВ: СУЧАСНИЙ СТАН ТА АКТУАЛЬНІ ПИТАННЯ","authors":"Світлана Козуліна","doi":"10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance of the paper. One of the most important classifications of regulatory acts is their classification according to legal force. It is legal force of the legal act that determines the place it occupies in the hierarchical (vertical) structure of the current legislation. According to Article 1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Ukraine is a social and legal state. Back in 2001, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine clearly stated: \"... in a legal state there is a strict hierarchy of regulatory acts ...\", but until now the hierarchy of regulatory acts is not legally established. Besides, between the separate laws of Ukraine, including those defining the status and powers of the public administration bodies, there is inconsistency regarding their place according to their legal force. There is no consensus on this issue in the scientific literature. It negatively affects the state of law in the state. Consequently, the relevance of this article is conditioned by the existing collisions in the legislation of Ukraine regarding the hierarchy of regulatory acts. The purpose of the article is the study of the current state of the hierarchical place of regulatory acts in the current legislation of Ukraine, the identification of collisions in it and the justification of proposals for their elimination. Body of the paper. Most Ukrainian scholars insist that the codes have the same legal force as the laws. However, some Ukrainian codes, in particular the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Budget Code of Ukraine, contain articles about their higher legal force. However, there are no such norms in other codes of Ukraine, therefore it should be noted: it can not be that in one branch of law the codified law has a higher legal force, and in the other it has not. Consequently, the issue of the legal force of codified and un-codified laws requires legislative regulation. The question arises as to the legal force of the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the decrees of the President of Ukraine (that is resolutions of the Parliament and decrees of the President of Ukraine of elusively regulatory nature). For example, in Article 113 of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine \"On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine\" the preference is given to the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, but in the Law of Ukraine \"On Civil Service\", on the contrary - to the decrees of the President of Ukraine. Conclusions. Until now, neither the Constitution of Ukraine nor other legislative acts define the hierarchy of certain regulatory acts, and therefore the scientific literature raises justified questions regarding their legal force. The current laws of Ukraine regulating the activities of public authorities solve these issues differently. And in law enforcement activities, including the issues on resolving litigation, the key role is played by subjectivity of a law enforcer. Eliminating this gap is possible only in one way that is by adopting the Law of Ukraine \"On Regulatory Acts\", which, among other issues, should clearly define the hierarchy of regulatory acts.","PeriodicalId":255564,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","volume":"17 24","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Актуальні проблеми державного управління","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35432/1993-8330appa2782019179068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Relevance of the paper. One of the most important classifications of regulatory acts is their classification according to legal force. It is legal force of the legal act that determines the place it occupies in the hierarchical (vertical) structure of the current legislation. According to Article 1 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Ukraine is a social and legal state. Back in 2001, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine clearly stated: "... in a legal state there is a strict hierarchy of regulatory acts ...", but until now the hierarchy of regulatory acts is not legally established. Besides, between the separate laws of Ukraine, including those defining the status and powers of the public administration bodies, there is inconsistency regarding their place according to their legal force. There is no consensus on this issue in the scientific literature. It negatively affects the state of law in the state. Consequently, the relevance of this article is conditioned by the existing collisions in the legislation of Ukraine regarding the hierarchy of regulatory acts. The purpose of the article is the study of the current state of the hierarchical place of regulatory acts in the current legislation of Ukraine, the identification of collisions in it and the justification of proposals for their elimination. Body of the paper. Most Ukrainian scholars insist that the codes have the same legal force as the laws. However, some Ukrainian codes, in particular the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Budget Code of Ukraine, contain articles about their higher legal force. However, there are no such norms in other codes of Ukraine, therefore it should be noted: it can not be that in one branch of law the codified law has a higher legal force, and in the other it has not. Consequently, the issue of the legal force of codified and un-codified laws requires legislative regulation. The question arises as to the legal force of the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the decrees of the President of Ukraine (that is resolutions of the Parliament and decrees of the President of Ukraine of elusively regulatory nature). For example, in Article 113 of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine" the preference is given to the resolutions of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, but in the Law of Ukraine "On Civil Service", on the contrary - to the decrees of the President of Ukraine. Conclusions. Until now, neither the Constitution of Ukraine nor other legislative acts define the hierarchy of certain regulatory acts, and therefore the scientific literature raises justified questions regarding their legal force. The current laws of Ukraine regulating the activities of public authorities solve these issues differently. And in law enforcement activities, including the issues on resolving litigation, the key role is played by subjectivity of a law enforcer. Eliminating this gap is possible only in one way that is by adopting the Law of Ukraine "On Regulatory Acts", which, among other issues, should clearly define the hierarchy of regulatory acts.
论文的相关性。规制行为的分类中最重要的分类之一是法律效力分类。法律行为的法律效力决定了它在现行立法的等级(垂直)结构中所占的地位。根据乌克兰宪法第一条,乌克兰是一个社会法治国家。早在2001年,乌克兰宪法法院就明确指出:“……在一个法治国家,监管行为有严格的等级制度……”,但直到现在,监管行为的等级制度还没有在法律上确立。此外,在乌克兰的各条法律之间,包括界定公共行政机构的地位和权力的法律之间,根据其法律效力,它们的地位是不一致的。在科学文献中对这个问题没有共识。它对该州的法律状况产生了负面影响。因此,本条的相关性取决于乌克兰立法中关于管制行为等级的现有冲突。本文的目的是研究乌克兰现行立法中监管行为等级地位的现状,确定其中的冲突以及消除这些冲突的建议的理由。论文正文。大多数乌克兰学者坚持认为,法典与法律具有同样的法律效力。然而,一些乌克兰法典,特别是乌克兰民法典、乌克兰预算法典,载有关于其更高法律效力的条款。但是,在乌克兰的其他法典中没有这种规范,因此应当指出:不可能在一个法律部门中,编纂的法律具有更高的法律效力,而在另一个部门中则没有。因此,成文法和非成文法的法律效力问题需要立法加以规范。问题在于乌克兰最高拉达的决议和乌克兰总统的法令(即议会的决议和乌克兰总统的法令具有难以捉摸的管制性质)的法律效力。例如,在乌克兰宪法第113条,即乌克兰法“关于乌克兰部长内阁”中,优先考虑乌克兰最高拉达的决议,但在乌克兰法“关于公务员制度”中,相反地,优先考虑乌克兰总统的法令。结论。到目前为止,乌克兰宪法和其他立法法案都没有定义某些监管行为的等级,因此科学文献对其法律效力提出了合理的问题。规范公共当局活动的乌克兰现行法律以不同的方式解决了这些问题。在包括解决诉讼问题在内的执法活动中,执法者的主体性发挥着关键作用。消除这一差距只能通过一种方式,即通过乌克兰“关于管制行为”的法律,该法律除其他问题外,应明确界定管制行为的等级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信