Hierarchical Attributes of Selected Stakeholders Participation in City Planning and Development: A Case Study of Khon Kaen Smart City, Thailand

Touch Seng, Rawee Hanpachern, Meng Bunnarith, Khwanchanok Ampha
{"title":"Hierarchical Attributes of Selected Stakeholders Participation in City Planning and Development: A Case Study of Khon Kaen Smart City, Thailand","authors":"Touch Seng, Rawee Hanpachern, Meng Bunnarith, Khwanchanok Ampha","doi":"10.56261/jars.v19i2.242726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to determine the hierarchical classification of the attributes of participation used by planners and selected stakeholders in a participatory planning approach for smart city development. It also attempts to contribute to the unsolved question raised by Wandersman Giamartino (1980) that “if participation is so rewarding and effective, why doesn’t everyone participate?” The exploratory sequential mixed method was applied for the data collection procedure. The results of the qualitative approach were used to develop the questionnaires which were conducted with 18 experts/ planners and 111 selected stakeholders. The findings indicated that the interest, influence, and area-based were the key attributes used by planning agency/planners to select the stakeholders to participate in the participatory planning processes. On the other hand, the selected stakeholders relied on the interest, area-based, influence, and urgency to decide to participate in the participatory planning process of Khon Kaen Smart City. Furthermore, the selected stakeholders preferred the on-place-participation rather than e-participation and informal and indirect participation gateways to have an influence on the processes of decision-making.  ","PeriodicalId":428713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56261/jars.v19i2.242726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to determine the hierarchical classification of the attributes of participation used by planners and selected stakeholders in a participatory planning approach for smart city development. It also attempts to contribute to the unsolved question raised by Wandersman Giamartino (1980) that “if participation is so rewarding and effective, why doesn’t everyone participate?” The exploratory sequential mixed method was applied for the data collection procedure. The results of the qualitative approach were used to develop the questionnaires which were conducted with 18 experts/ planners and 111 selected stakeholders. The findings indicated that the interest, influence, and area-based were the key attributes used by planning agency/planners to select the stakeholders to participate in the participatory planning processes. On the other hand, the selected stakeholders relied on the interest, area-based, influence, and urgency to decide to participate in the participatory planning process of Khon Kaen Smart City. Furthermore, the selected stakeholders preferred the on-place-participation rather than e-participation and informal and indirect participation gateways to have an influence on the processes of decision-making.  
城市规划与发展中选定利益相关者参与的层次属性——以泰国孔敬智慧城市为例
本文旨在确定规划者和选定的利益相关者在智慧城市发展的参与式规划方法中使用的参与属性的分层分类。它还试图对Wandersman Giamartino(1980)提出的未解决的问题做出贡献,即“如果参与是如此有益和有效,为什么不是每个人都参与?”数据采集过程采用探索性顺序混合法。定性方法的结果被用来制定问卷调查与18名专家/规划师和111选定的利益相关者进行。调查结果表明,利益、影响和基于地区是规划机构/规划者在选择参与参与式规划过程的利益相关者时所使用的关键属性。另一方面,选定的利益相关者根据利益,区域,影响力和紧迫性决定参与孔敬智慧城市的参与式规划过程。此外,选定的利益相关者更倾向于现场参与,而不是电子参与和非正式和间接参与途径,以对决策过程产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信