Strategy and Structure: A Repeated Game Approach

F. Balmaceda
{"title":"Strategy and Structure: A Repeated Game Approach","authors":"F. Balmaceda","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.930059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Williamson (1975), a divisionalized and fully decentralized structure, the so called M-form, is the optimal structure via which firms that pursue diversification gain economic benefits from internalizing transactions. However, empirical evidence shows that a centralized, multi-divisional structure, the so called CM-Form, is the optimal structure when related diversification is the objective, while the M-form is optimal when seeking unrelated diversification. This paper proposes a repeated game model to study the link between strategy and structure. The main prediction of the model is that a related strategy is, overall, better served by a centralized structure, while an unrelated strategy is better served by a decentralized structure.","PeriodicalId":230377,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Integration (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Integration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.930059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

According to Williamson (1975), a divisionalized and fully decentralized structure, the so called M-form, is the optimal structure via which firms that pursue diversification gain economic benefits from internalizing transactions. However, empirical evidence shows that a centralized, multi-divisional structure, the so called CM-Form, is the optimal structure when related diversification is the objective, while the M-form is optimal when seeking unrelated diversification. This paper proposes a repeated game model to study the link between strategy and structure. The main prediction of the model is that a related strategy is, overall, better served by a centralized structure, while an unrelated strategy is better served by a decentralized structure.
策略和结构:重复博弈方法
Williamson(1975)认为,事业部化和完全分散的结构,即所谓的m型结构,是追求多元化的企业从内部化交易中获得经济利益的最优结构。然而,经验证据表明,当以关联多元化为目标时,集中的、多部门的结构,即cm型结构是最优结构,而当以不相关多元化为目标时,m型结构是最优结构。本文提出了一个重复博弈模型来研究策略与结构之间的关系。该模型的主要预测是,总体而言,集中式结构更好地服务于相关策略,而分散结构更好地服务于不相关策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信