SECOND LANGUAGE INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY RETENTION: THE EFFECT OF TEXT AND PICTURE ANNOTATION TYPES

M. Yoshii, J. Flaitz
{"title":"SECOND LANGUAGE INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY RETENTION: THE EFFECT OF TEXT AND PICTURE ANNOTATION TYPES","authors":"M. Yoshii, J. Flaitz","doi":"10.1558/CJ.V20I1.33-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examines the effect that annotation type has on L2 incidental vocabulary retention in a multimedia reading setting. Three annotation types were compared: text-only, picture-only, and a combination of the two. The participants were 151 adult ESL learners at beginning and intermediate language proficiency levels. The participants read a story for comprehension purposes using the Internet. Three types of instruments were used for vocabulary retention assessment: Picture recognition, Word recognition, and Definition Supply tests. The results ANOVA analyses indicate that the Combination group (annotations with text and picture) outperformed the Text-only and Picture-only groups on the immediate tests. The Combination group also outperformed the other two groups on the delayed tests, however, the differences were smaller than those for the immediate tests. There was no significant interaction between annotation type and proficiency level for either the immediate or the delayed tests. Repeated measure ANOVAs revealed no significant differences among the groups in the rate of change between the immediate test scores and delayed test scores. The participants' scores on the delayed tests, regardless of the group to which they were assigned, declined equally from those of the immediate tests.","PeriodicalId":357125,"journal":{"name":"the CALICO Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"162","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the CALICO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.V20I1.33-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 162

Abstract

The present study examines the effect that annotation type has on L2 incidental vocabulary retention in a multimedia reading setting. Three annotation types were compared: text-only, picture-only, and a combination of the two. The participants were 151 adult ESL learners at beginning and intermediate language proficiency levels. The participants read a story for comprehension purposes using the Internet. Three types of instruments were used for vocabulary retention assessment: Picture recognition, Word recognition, and Definition Supply tests. The results ANOVA analyses indicate that the Combination group (annotations with text and picture) outperformed the Text-only and Picture-only groups on the immediate tests. The Combination group also outperformed the other two groups on the delayed tests, however, the differences were smaller than those for the immediate tests. There was no significant interaction between annotation type and proficiency level for either the immediate or the delayed tests. Repeated measure ANOVAs revealed no significant differences among the groups in the rate of change between the immediate test scores and delayed test scores. The participants' scores on the delayed tests, regardless of the group to which they were assigned, declined equally from those of the immediate tests.
二语附带词汇记忆:文字和图片标注类型的影响
本研究考察了多媒体阅读环境下注释类型对二语附带词汇记忆的影响。比较了三种注释类型:纯文本、纯图片和两者的组合。参与者为151名初中级英语水平的成人ESL学习者。参与者使用互联网阅读一个故事来理解目的。三种类型的工具被用于词汇保留评估:图片识别,单词识别和定义供应测试。方差分析结果表明,组合组(文本和图片注释)在即时测试中优于纯文本组和纯图片组。在延迟测试中,组合组的表现也优于其他两组,但差异小于即时测试。在即时测试和延迟测试中,标注类型和熟练程度之间没有显著的交互作用。重复测量方差分析显示,组间即时测试成绩和延迟测试成绩的变化率无显著差异。无论参与者被分配到哪一组,他们在延迟测试中的分数都比即时测试中的分数下降得一样快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信