Custos de Transação no Setor Automotivo: Atributos Transacionais, Pressupostos Comportamentais e Limitações Teóricas

C. A. Augusto, J. P. D. Souza, S. Cário
{"title":"Custos de Transação no Setor Automotivo: Atributos Transacionais, Pressupostos Comportamentais e Limitações Teóricas","authors":"C. A. Augusto, J. P. D. Souza, S. Cário","doi":"10.5585/IJSM.V18I2.2716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Our objective with this article was to understand the influence of the choice of governance structures by automakers to obtain their auto parts on transaction costs. Method: We carried out a qualitative, descriptive and cross-cut research regarding the years of 2016 and 2017. We collected primary data from semi-structured interviews with agents from three automotive assemblers and from Industries Federation of the State of Paraná (FIEP). Originality / Relevance: According to the Economy of Transaction Costs theory (ECT), in the specific sector of auto parts of the automotive industry, vertical integration would be the most efficient structure. However, we questioned whether this is the reality in this sector, since integration and disintegration movements are identified in the literature. The strength of the transaction attribute is analyzed as a determining factor for governance structure choice. Results: No strong evidence was found to justify the choice of vertical integration or contracting in the sector, considering the assumptions of ECT (theoretical basis of the study). The results point out auto parts of high specificity in both structures. Theoretical / methodological contributions: We concluded that the high level of specificity alone does not justify the choice for vertical integration or contracting. Thus, complementary theoretical approaches are necessary to understand the firm’s boundary decisions. Social / management contributions: The choice of theoretical complementarity to understand the phenomena, especially associated to the decisions to integrate activities or not, may help managers in their operational and strategic decisions.","PeriodicalId":353150,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/IJSM.V18I2.2716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our objective with this article was to understand the influence of the choice of governance structures by automakers to obtain their auto parts on transaction costs. Method: We carried out a qualitative, descriptive and cross-cut research regarding the years of 2016 and 2017. We collected primary data from semi-structured interviews with agents from three automotive assemblers and from Industries Federation of the State of Paraná (FIEP). Originality / Relevance: According to the Economy of Transaction Costs theory (ECT), in the specific sector of auto parts of the automotive industry, vertical integration would be the most efficient structure. However, we questioned whether this is the reality in this sector, since integration and disintegration movements are identified in the literature. The strength of the transaction attribute is analyzed as a determining factor for governance structure choice. Results: No strong evidence was found to justify the choice of vertical integration or contracting in the sector, considering the assumptions of ECT (theoretical basis of the study). The results point out auto parts of high specificity in both structures. Theoretical / methodological contributions: We concluded that the high level of specificity alone does not justify the choice for vertical integration or contracting. Thus, complementary theoretical approaches are necessary to understand the firm’s boundary decisions. Social / management contributions: The choice of theoretical complementarity to understand the phenomena, especially associated to the decisions to integrate activities or not, may help managers in their operational and strategic decisions.
汽车行业的交易成本:交易属性、行为假设和理论局限性
目的:我们这篇文章的目的是了解汽车制造商为获得他们的汽车零部件而选择的治理结构对交易成本的影响。方法:对2016年和2017年进行定性、描述性和交叉研究。我们从三家汽车装配商和帕拉帕州工业联合会(FIEP)的半结构化访谈中收集了主要数据。原创性/相关性:根据交易成本经济学理论(ECT),在汽车行业的特定汽车零部件领域,垂直整合将是最有效的结构。然而,我们质疑这是否是该部门的现实,因为文献中已经确定了整合和解体运动。分析了事务属性强度作为治理结构选择的决定因素。结果:考虑到ECT(本研究的理论基础)的假设,没有发现强有力的证据来证明在部门中选择垂直整合或承包是合理的。结果表明,汽车零部件在这两种结构中都具有很高的特异性。理论/方法贡献:我们的结论是,高水平的特异性本身并不能证明选择垂直整合或收缩是合理的。因此,互补的理论方法对于理解企业的边界决策是必要的。社会/管理贡献:选择理论互补性来理解现象,特别是与是否整合活动的决策有关的现象,可能有助于管理者进行业务和战略决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信