Pet Lamb and Clothed Hyena: Law as an Oppressive Force in Jane Eyre

A. Maine
{"title":"Pet Lamb and Clothed Hyena: Law as an Oppressive Force in Jane Eyre","authors":"A. Maine","doi":"10.19164/SJPPAR.V1I1.793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing in 1864, the literary critic Justin M’Carthy stated that ‘the greatest social difficulty in England today is the relationship between men and women.’ This came at a time of unprecedented social and legal change of the status of women in the 19th Century. A prominent novel of the time concerning such social difficulty is Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre: An Autobiography which attempts to reflect these social difficulties as often resulting from law. As such, the novel may be used as a reflection of the condition of nineteenth century English law as an oppressive force against women. This force is one that enacts morality through legality, and has particular resonance in literature concerning social issues. Jane Eyre will be discussed as a novel that provides insights into women’s experiences in the mid-nineteenth century. Law is represented within the novel as an oppressive force that directly subjugates women, and as such the novel may be regarded as an early liberal feminist work that challenges the condition of law. This article will explore the link between good moral behaviour, and moral madness, the latter being perceived as a threat to the domestic and the law’s response to this threat. It will pick upon certain themes presented by Brontë, such as injustice towards women, wrongful confinement, insanity and adulterous immoral behaviour, to come to the conclusion that the novelist presented law as a method of constructing immorality and injustice, representing inequality and repression.","PeriodicalId":191675,"journal":{"name":"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Student Journal of Professional Practice and Academic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/SJPPAR.V1I1.793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing in 1864, the literary critic Justin M’Carthy stated that ‘the greatest social difficulty in England today is the relationship between men and women.’ This came at a time of unprecedented social and legal change of the status of women in the 19th Century. A prominent novel of the time concerning such social difficulty is Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre: An Autobiography which attempts to reflect these social difficulties as often resulting from law. As such, the novel may be used as a reflection of the condition of nineteenth century English law as an oppressive force against women. This force is one that enacts morality through legality, and has particular resonance in literature concerning social issues. Jane Eyre will be discussed as a novel that provides insights into women’s experiences in the mid-nineteenth century. Law is represented within the novel as an oppressive force that directly subjugates women, and as such the novel may be regarded as an early liberal feminist work that challenges the condition of law. This article will explore the link between good moral behaviour, and moral madness, the latter being perceived as a threat to the domestic and the law’s response to this threat. It will pick upon certain themes presented by Brontë, such as injustice towards women, wrongful confinement, insanity and adulterous immoral behaviour, to come to the conclusion that the novelist presented law as a method of constructing immorality and injustice, representing inequality and repression.
宠物羔羊与穿衣服的鬣狗:《简爱》中的法律压迫力量
文学评论家贾斯汀·麦卡锡在1864年写道:“当今英国最大的社会难题是男女之间的关系。”19世纪,女性的社会地位和法律地位发生了前所未有的变化。夏洛蒂Brontë的《简·爱:自传》是当时关于这种社会困境的一部杰出小说,它试图反映这些往往由法律引起的社会困境。因此,这部小说可以被用来反映19世纪英国法律作为压迫妇女的力量的状况。这种力量是一种通过法律来制定道德的力量,在涉及社会问题的文学作品中有着特殊的共鸣。《简·爱》将作为一部深入探讨十九世纪中期女性经历的小说来讨论。在小说中,法律被表现为一种直接征服女性的压迫力量,因此这部小说可以被视为一部挑战法律状况的早期自由主义女权主义作品。本文将探讨良好的道德行为和道德疯狂之间的联系,后者被视为对国内的威胁以及法律对这种威胁的反应。它将挑选Brontë所呈现的某些主题,例如对妇女的不公正,错误的监禁,精神错乱和通奸的不道德行为,从而得出结论,小说家将法律作为构建不道德和不公正的方法,代表不平等和压迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信