{"title":"Disrupting Wisdom 2.0: The Quest for \"Mindfulness\" in Silicon Valley and Beyond","authors":"Kevin Healey","doi":"10.1163/21659214-90000101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In early 2014 activist Amanda Ream and members of Eviction Free San Francisco disrupted the fifth annual Wisdom 2.0 conference, at which Silicon Valley leaders discuss the benefits of ‘mindfulness’ practices. It was another confrontation between working-class residents of San Francisco and the technology employees who have gentrified their neighborhoods. A member of the East Bay Meditation Center in Oakland, Ream’s actions garnered support from other ‘socially engaged’ Buddhists from Berkeley and elsewhere. Secular critics have likewise questioned the appropriation of Buddhist practices by corporations whose business practices and products arguably undermine the cultivation of mindfulness. This article intervenes in these debates by outlining an approach called Contemplative Media Studies, which integrates critical media studies with the emerging field of Contemplative Studies. I argue that market imperatives have favored a corporate-friendly understanding of mindfulness that perpetuates structural injustice, and conclude that an expanded notion of civic mindfulness must include the revitalization of journalism and the development of non-commercial media systems.","PeriodicalId":142820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-90000101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
In early 2014 activist Amanda Ream and members of Eviction Free San Francisco disrupted the fifth annual Wisdom 2.0 conference, at which Silicon Valley leaders discuss the benefits of ‘mindfulness’ practices. It was another confrontation between working-class residents of San Francisco and the technology employees who have gentrified their neighborhoods. A member of the East Bay Meditation Center in Oakland, Ream’s actions garnered support from other ‘socially engaged’ Buddhists from Berkeley and elsewhere. Secular critics have likewise questioned the appropriation of Buddhist practices by corporations whose business practices and products arguably undermine the cultivation of mindfulness. This article intervenes in these debates by outlining an approach called Contemplative Media Studies, which integrates critical media studies with the emerging field of Contemplative Studies. I argue that market imperatives have favored a corporate-friendly understanding of mindfulness that perpetuates structural injustice, and conclude that an expanded notion of civic mindfulness must include the revitalization of journalism and the development of non-commercial media systems.
2014年初,维权人士阿曼达·雷姆(Amanda Ream)和“驱逐自由旧金山”(Eviction Free San Francisco)的成员扰乱了第五届智慧2.0年会,硅谷领导人在会上讨论“正念”实践的好处。这是旧金山工薪阶层居民与让自己所在社区变得中产阶级化的科技员工之间的又一场对抗。Ream是奥克兰东湾冥想中心(East Bay Meditation Center)的成员,他的行动得到了伯克利和其他地方“参与社会活动”的佛教徒的支持。世俗的批评人士同样质疑那些商业行为和产品破坏了正念培养的公司挪用佛教的做法。本文通过概述一种称为沉思媒体研究的方法来介入这些争论,该方法将批判性媒体研究与沉思研究的新兴领域相结合。我认为,市场需求倾向于企业对正念的友好理解,这种理解使结构性不公正得以延续,并得出结论,公民正念的扩展概念必须包括新闻业的复兴和非商业媒体系统的发展。